Re: [kvm-devel] [RFC] [VTD][patch 3/3] vt-d support for pci passthrough: kvm-intel-iommu.patch

[Anthony L. <an...@co...>]

Kay, Allen M wrote:
> Intel-iommu driver changes for kvm vt-d support.  Important changes are
> in intel-iommu.c.  The rest of the changes are for moving intel-iommu.h
> and iova.h from drivers/pci directory to include/linux directory.
>
> Signed-off-by: Allen M Kay <all...@in...>
>
> ----
>
>  b/drivers/pci/dmar.c          |    4 
>  b/drivers/pci/intel-iommu.c   |   26 ++-
>  b/drivers/pci/iova.c          |    2 
>  b/include/linux/intel-iommu.h |  344
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  b/include/linux/iova.h        |   52 ++++++
>  drivers/pci/intel-iommu.h     |  344
> ------------------------------------------
>  drivers/pci/iova.h            |   52 ------
>  7 files changed, 416 insertions(+), 408 deletions(-)
>
> ----
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/dmar.c b/drivers/pci/dmar.c
> index f941f60..a58a5b0 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/dmar.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/dmar.c
> @@ -26,8 +26,8 @@
>  
>  #include <linux/pci.h>
>  #include <linux/dmar.h>
> -#include "iova.h"
> -#include "intel-iommu.h"
> +#include <linux/iova.h>
> +#include <linux/intel-iommu.h>
>  
>  #undef PREFIX
>  #define PREFIX "DMAR:"
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/intel-iommu.c b/drivers/pci/intel-iommu.c
> index 4cb949f..bfa888b 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/intel-iommu.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/intel-iommu.c
> @@ -31,8 +31,8 @@
>  #include <linux/dmar.h>
>  #include <linux/dma-mapping.h>
>  #include <linux/mempool.h>
> -#include "iova.h"
> -#include "intel-iommu.h"
> +#include <linux/iova.h>
> +#include <linux/intel-iommu.h>
>  #include <asm/proto.h> /* force_iommu in this header in x86-64*/
>  #include <asm/cacheflush.h>
>  #include <asm/gart.h>
> @@ -1056,7 +1056,7 @@ static void free_iommu(struct intel_iommu *iommu)
>  	kfree(iommu);
>  }
>  
> -static struct dmar_domain * iommu_alloc_domain(struct intel_iommu
> *iommu)
> +struct dmar_domain * iommu_alloc_domain(struct intel_iommu *iommu)
>  {
>  	unsigned long num;
>  	unsigned long ndomains;
> @@ -1086,8 +1086,9 @@ static struct dmar_domain *
> iommu_alloc_domain(struct intel_iommu *iommu)
>  
>  	return domain;
>  }
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(iommu_alloc_domain);
>  
> -static void iommu_free_domain(struct dmar_domain *domain)
> +void iommu_free_domain(struct dmar_domain *domain)
>  {
>  	unsigned long flags;
>  
> @@ -1095,6 +1096,7 @@ static void iommu_free_domain(struct dmar_domain
> *domain)
>  	clear_bit(domain->id, domain->iommu->domain_ids);
>  	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&domain->iommu->lock, flags);
>  }
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(iommu_free_domain);
>  
>  static struct iova_domain reserved_iova_list;
>  static struct lock_class_key reserved_alloc_key;
> @@ -1160,7 +1162,7 @@ static inline int guestwidth_to_adjustwidth(int
> gaw)
>  	return agaw;
>  }
>  
> -static int domain_init(struct dmar_domain *domain, int guest_width)
> +int domain_init(struct dmar_domain *domain, int guest_width)
>  {
>   

I think it's already been mentioned, but these are pretty terrible names 
if you're exporting these symbols.  Linux supports other IOMMUs so VT-d 
should not be hogging the iommu_* namespace.

Regards,

Anthony Liguori