From: Paul B. <pa...@co...> - 2008-05-02 20:16:30
|
> > Maybe 'VCPU' would be a clearer name? QEMU provides its own VCPU, and > > KQEMU+QEMU also provide one toegether. While KVM provides essentially > > one or more whole VCPUs by itself and uses QEMU's drivers only doesn't > > it? > > > > -- Jamie > > VCPU is rather confusing with the vcpus themselves. KVM, for instance, > has its own structures called "vcpu". > > If it is preferred, however, we can name the structure VCPUOperations, > and change the function names that involves accel_yyy to vcpu_op_yyy() kvm wants to hook into more than just the CPU doesn't it? Paul |