From: Avi K. <av...@qu...> - 2008-05-02 15:02:54
|
Daniel P. Berrange wrote: >> I guess using file locking by default would improve the situation, and >> we can add a -drive ...,exclusive=no option for people playing with >> cluster filesystems. >> > > Turning on file locking by default will break existing apps / deployments > using shared disks. IMHO this is a policy decision that should be solved > at ahigher level in the management stack where a whole world view is > available rather than QEMU which only knows about its own VM & host. > Running a newer qemu with an older libvirt would pose a problem, yes. But we shouldn't ignore unmanaged deployments. -- I have a truly marvellous patch that fixes the bug which this signature is too narrow to contain. |