From: Avi K. <av...@qu...> - 2008-05-02 11:23:20
|
Jan Kiszka wrote: > Yeah, it is. Reminds me of another warning I recently came across > (offsets may vary due to other patches: > > ==5801== 1 errors in context 1 of 2: > ==5801== Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s) > ==5801== at 0x53F4AE: kvm_register_userspace_phys_mem (libkvm.c:552) > ==5801== by 0x521ACA: kvm_cpu_register_physical_memory (qemu-kvm.c:654) > ==5801== by 0x45FC82: pc_init1 (pc.c:809) > ==5801== by 0x461313: pc_init_pci (pc.c:1149) > ==5801== by 0x43081B: main (vl.c:9845) > > This silences valgrind and may even be correct (if I got the code path > right): > > Signed-off-by: Jan Kiszka <jan...@si...> > > --- a/libkvm/libkvm.c > +++ b/libkvm/libkvm.c > @@ -328,9 +328,10 @@ static int kvm_create_default_phys_mem(k > > #ifdef KVM_CAP_USER_MEMORY > r = ioctl(kvm->fd, KVM_CHECK_EXTENSION, KVM_CAP_USER_MEMORY); > - if (r > 0) > + if (r > 0) { > + kvm->physical_memory = NULL; > return 0; > - else > + } else > #endif > r = kvm_alloc_kernel_memory(kvm, memory, vm_mem); > if (r < 0) > > As related earlier, physical_memory is bogus, so I removed it. Let's pretend it never existed. -- I have a truly marvellous patch that fixes the bug which this signature is too narrow to contain. |