From: Avi K. <av...@qu...> - 2008-04-30 12:52:13
|
Andrea Arcangeli wrote: > On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 11:59:47AM +0300, Avi Kivity wrote: > >> The code is not trying to find a vma for the address, but a vma for the >> address which also has VM_PFNMAP set. The cases for vma not found, or vma >> found, but not VM_PFNMAP, are folded together. >> > > Muli's saying the comparison is reversed, change >= to <. > Err, yes. -- Any sufficiently difficult bug is indistinguishable from a feature. |