|
From: Andrea A. <an...@qu...> - 2008-04-30 12:52:02
|
On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 11:59:47AM +0300, Avi Kivity wrote: > The code is not trying to find a vma for the address, but a vma for the > address which also has VM_PFNMAP set. The cases for vma not found, or vma > found, but not VM_PFNMAP, are folded together. Muli's saying the comparison is reversed, change >= to <. |