Re: [kvm-devel] [PATCH 0/4] paravirt clock patches

[Gerd H. <kr...@re...>]

Avi Kivity wrote:
> The patches look good, but pleasy copy Jeremy and virtualization@ for
> patches which touch things outside kvm.

Will do for the next round.

> It's perhaps better to reverse the order: first fix kvm to be
> compatible, then merge the Xen and kvm implementations into a single one.

Fixing kvm (guest side) would be copying parts of the xen guest code, so
that doesn't make much sense to me ...

cheers,
  Gerd

-- 
http://kraxel.fedorapeople.org/xenner/