From: Chris L. <cla...@re...> - 2008-04-24 22:13:13
|
Avi Kivity wrote: > Now it uses %rsi instead of %esi, and any junk in the upper bits will > cause the ja to be taken. > > We need to get a reduced testcase to the gcc folks, this is a serious > bug. Any changes in the code to work around this would be fragile. > Avi, I've now filed a bug in the upstream gcc database: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36040 And I came up with a reduced test case, available here: http://people.redhat.com/clalance/rsi-test-case.tar.bz2 If I compile the code in the above and look at the disassembly, it shows the problem; however, I can't reproduce the bug by actually running the code. I suspect the %rsi register is always 0 when we start in this userland code, so I never run into the bogus ja, but I just thought I'd mention it. Chris Lalancette |