Re: [kvm-devel] [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH 1/3] Refactor AIO interface to allow other AIO implementations

[Avi K. <av...@qu...>]

Javier Guerra Giraldez wrote:
> On Sunday 20 April 2008, Avi Kivity wrote:
>   
>> Also, I'd presume that those that need 10K IOPS and above will not place
>> their high throughput images on a filesystem; rather on a separate SAN LUN.
>>     
>
> i think that too; but still that LUN would be accessed by the VM's via one of 
> these IO emulation layers, right?
>
>   

Yes.  Hopefully Linux aio.

> or maybe you're advocating using the SAN initiator in the VM instead of the 
> host?
>   

That works too, especially for iSCSI, but that's not what I'm advocating.


-- 
Do not meddle in the internals of kernels, for they are subtle and quick to panic.