From: Hollis B. <ho...@us...> - 2008-04-15 19:28:46
|
On Tuesday 15 April 2008 14:09:22 Jerone Young wrote: > On Tue, 2008-04-15 at 13:56 -0500, Hollis Blanchard wrote: > > On Tuesday 15 April 2008 13:29:19 Jerone Young wrote: > > > I will > > > have to look into this more after I finish the next task. I don't > > > honestly know all that much about the preempt frame work. But I have > > > spent time trying to figure it out. > > > > Great, I will look forward to the corrected patch. > > I would suggest that you include the current patch so that other can use > the functionality and it can be changed to use the common code function > once I figure out the preempt issue. Otherwise anyone trying to use our > source is still going to suffer from guest eating 100% cpu when idle. Look, I won't commit this. Just fix it. I don't know how else to say it. -- Hollis Blanchard IBM Linux Technology Center |