From: Avi K. <av...@qu...> - 2008-04-13 15:05:39
|
Marcelo Tosatti wrote: > On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 01:59:35PM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote: > >> With the IO thread, shouldn't we be striving to perform the select()s >> within the IO thread itself to completely avoid the need to use SIGIO at >> all? >> > > Fully agree. Problem with it are the fundamental changes in qemu that > are required (and the difficulty merging those in qemu). > > One is tempted to use pselect() to temporarily unblock the signals while waiting. This has two problems, though: one, pselect() is emulated in libc with older kernels, and this emulation has an (unavoidable) race. Two, I think pselect() will deliver the signal in addition to returning, which we want to avoid. Not sure about this though. -- error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function |