From: Zhang, X. <xia...@in...> - 2008-03-31 09:56:34
|
Jes Sorensen wrote: > Hi Xiantao, > > I general I think the code in this patch is fine. I have a couple of > nit-picking comments: > >> + if (target_mask&0x1) { > > The formatting here isn't quite what most of the kernel does. It would > be better if you added spaces so it's a little easier to read, ie: Good suggesion! > if (target_mask & 0x1) { > >> + p = &__per_cpu_idtrs[cpu][0][0]; >> + for (i = IA64_TR_ALLOC_BASE; i <= per_cpu(ia64_tr_used, cpu); >> + i++, >> p++) { >> + if (p->pte&0x1) > > Same thing here. > >> +#define RR_TO_RID(rr) ((rr)<<32>>40) > > I would prefer to have this one defined like this: > > #define RR_TO_RID(rr) (rr >> 8) & 0xffffff > > It should generate the same code, but is more intuitive for the > reader. Looks better :) > Otherwise I think this patch is fine - this is really just cosmetics. Thank you! Xiantao |