From: Christoph L. <cla...@sg...> - 2008-01-23 19:48:44
|
On Wed, 23 Jan 2008, Andrea Arcangeli wrote: > On Wed, Jan 23, 2008 at 04:52:47AM -0600, Robin Holt wrote: > > But 100 callouts holding spinlocks will not work for our implementation > > and even if the callouts are made with spinlocks released, we would very > > strongly prefer a single callout which messages the range to the other > > side. > > But you take the physical address and turn into mm+va with your rmap... The remote mm+va or a local mm+va? |