From: Haydn S. <hay...@gm...> - 2007-11-07 19:55:51
|
On Nov 7, 2007 2:48 PM, Amit Shah <ami...@qu...> wrote: > On Thursday 08 November 2007 01:05:32 Haydn Solomon wrote: > > First , thank you for new release of kvm. I have a few problems to > > report with kvm-51. > > > > 1. When running an exisiting winxp ACPI multiprocessor HAL with -smp 2, > > sometimes it will hang on boot. > > You mean the guest hangs, right? What's your host system? Yes, sorry, I meant my guest hanges. Host details are: Linux localhost.localdomain 2.6.23.1-21.fc7 #1 SMP Thu Nov 1 20:28:15 EDT 2007 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux output of /proc/cpu processor : 1 vendor_id : GenuineIntel cpu family : 6 model : 15 model name : Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU T7500 @ 2.20GHz stepping : 10 cpu MHz : 800.000 cache size : 4096 KB physical id : 0 siblings : 2 core id : 1 cpu cores : 2 fpu : yes fpu_exception : yes cpuid level : 10 wp : yes flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm pbe syscall nx lm constant_tsc arch_perfmon pebs bts rep_good pni monitor ds_cpl vmx est tm2 ssse3 cx16 xtpr lahf_lm ida bogomips : 4387.71 clflush size : 64 cache_alignment : 64 address sizes : 36 bits physical, 48 bits virtual power management: Ok, I'm running kvm-50 again and looking at my cpu usage and it's about the same as what I'm seeing on 51. However, I did upgrade my fedora 7 kernel since running kvm-50 so I think that probably explains the cpu usage part. And it's not that the cpu usage is high by any means, just that it was really low on my previous kernel. Haydn > > > > 2. This may not be a major problem but cpu usage is a litte higher when > > idle on release 51 than 50. It was very low on 50, the lowest I've seen > > in a long time. > > 3. For me personally, the best performing release to date is release 50. > > > > Regards > > > > Haydn > |