From: Glauber de O. C. <gc...@re...> - 2007-10-30 12:13:11
|
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Ingo Molnar escreveu: > * Rusty Russell <ru...@ru...> wrote: > > and just in case it's not obvious: i am not arguing for the inclusion of > the patch, i'm just pointing out the plain fact that in the case where > the TSC _is_ reliable, 5 different clocksource drivers for has obvious > disadvantages. Anyone arguing against that simple point needs his head > examined :) Once we can pass around calibration information from the > host to the guest (which we dont do at the moment) there will be reason > not to use the native clocksource driver in the guest. If you sustain that we cannot have a reliable synchronization test mechanism, neither do I. All this is based in the assumption that a bad tsc will fail such tests. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Remi - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFHJyAHjYI8LaFUWXMRAtYoAJ9l5kNodRLfTsNHDvyioufM7SQzTACfarEy XXq3sDq9uxZ/72hhA46YmgM= =DwN/ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |