From: H. P. A. <hp...@zy...> - 2007-10-30 00:18:20
|
Glauber de Oliveira Costa wrote: > From: Glauber de Oliveira Costa <glauber@t60.localdomain> > > tsc is very good time source (when it does not have drifts, does not > change it's frequency, i.e. when it works), so it should have its rating > raised to a value greater than, or equal 400. > > Since it's being a tendency among paravirt clocksources to use values > around 400, we should declare tsc as even better: So we use 500. > > This patch also touches the comments on clocksource.h, which suggests > that 499 would be a limit on the rating values. > > Signed-off-by: Glauber de Oliveira Costa <gc...@re...> Are you sure these paravirt sources don't intentionally trump the TSC? -hpa |