Menu
▾
▴
kvm-ia64-devel
|
From: Avi K. <av...@qu...> - 2008-04-24 12:54:18
|
I propose moving the kvm lists to vger.kernel.org, for the following benefits: - better spam control - faster service (I see significant lag with the sourceforge lists) - no ads appended to the end of each email If no objections are raised, and if the vger postmasters agree, I will mass subscribe the current subscribers so that there will be no service interruption. Opinions? -- error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function |
|
From: Yang, S. <she...@in...> - 2008-04-24 12:58:48
|
On Thursday 24 April 2008 20:54:10 Avi Kivity wrote: > I propose moving the kvm lists to vger.kernel.org, for the following > benefits: > > - better spam control > - faster service (I see significant lag with the sourceforge lists) > - no ads appended to the end of each email > > If no objections are raised, and if the vger postmasters agree, I will > mass subscribe the current subscribers so that there will be no service > interruption. > > Opinions? Yeah, finally we don't need to meet something like this everyday: "This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/" ;) -- Thanks Yang, Sheng |
|
From: Jes S. <je...@sg...> - 2008-04-24 13:10:02
|
>>>>> "Avi" == Avi Kivity <av...@qu...> writes: Avi> I propose moving the kvm lists to vger.kernel.org, for the Avi> following benefits: Avi> - better spam control - faster service (I see significant lag Avi> with the sourceforge lists) - no ads appended to the end of each Avi> email Avi> If no objections are raised, and if the vger postmasters agree, I Avi> will mass subscribe the current subscribers so that there will be Avi> no service interruption. Avi> Opinions? Pretty please! The sooner, the better! Cheers, Jes |
|
From: David M. <da...@da...> - 2008-04-24 13:26:41
|
From: Avi Kivity <av...@qu...> Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2008 15:54:10 +0300 > I propose moving the kvm lists to vger.kernel.org, for the following > benefits: > > - better spam control > - faster service (I see significant lag with the sourceforge lists) > - no ads appended to the end of each email > > If no objections are raised, and if the vger postmasters agree, I will > mass subscribe the current subscribers so that there will be no service > interruption. I'm fine with adding the list, but we don't do mass subscribes like that, and this rule applies to every list which moves to vger from somewhere else. People will need to subscribe themselves to the new list. We enforce this for two reasons: 1) If they don't go through the action of subscribing, they won't be able to unsubscribe, so they'll be upset and also bug us postmasters for help. 2) People are generally unhappy when they are subscribed to mailing lists at a site they didn't ask to be at. |
|
From: Avi K. <av...@qu...> - 2008-04-24 13:33:24
|
David Miller wrote: >> If no objections are raised, and if the vger postmasters agree, I will >> mass subscribe the current subscribers so that there will be no service >> interruption. >> > > I'm fine with adding the list, but we don't do mass subscribes like > that, and this rule applies to every list which moves to vger from > somewhere else. > > (three lists) > People will need to subscribe themselves to the new list. > Okay. Will give people a week's notice to subscribe. -- error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function |
|
From: Andi K. <an...@fi...> - 2008-04-24 19:43:15
|
David Miller <da...@da...> writes: > I'm fine with adding the list, but we don't do mass subscribes like > that, and this rule applies to every list which moves to vger from > somewhere else. > > People will need to subscribe themselves to the new list. Can someone please resubscribe gmane too for us gmane users when the move occurs? Thanks, -Andi |
|
From: Avi K. <av...@qu...> - 2008-04-24 16:01:33
|
Hollis Blanchard wrote: > On Thursday 24 April 2008 07:54:10 Avi Kivity wrote: > >> I propose moving the kvm lists to vger.kernel.org, for the following >> benefits: >> >> - better spam control >> - faster service (I see significant lag with the sourceforge lists) >> - no ads appended to the end of each email >> >> If no objections are raised, and if the vger postmasters agree, I will >> mass subscribe the current subscribers so that there will be no service >> interruption. >> > > Sounds good to me. > > Will we continue to have manual moderation for non-subscribers? That seems to > be a good way to handle the last 1% of spam that sneaks through the automated > filters. > kvm-devel doesn't do manual moderation. If vger has the infrastructure, I don't see why you can't continue doing this on kvm-ppc-devel. btw, we can probably shorten the names to kvm@ and kvm-$arch@ while we're at it. -- error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function |
|
From: Jes S. <je...@sg...> - 2008-04-25 09:18:28
|
>>>>> "Avi" == Avi Kivity <av...@qu...> writes: Avi> kvm-devel doesn't do manual moderation. If vger has the Avi> infrastructure, I don't see why you can't continue doing this on Avi> kvm-ppc-devel. Please don't do this for the kvm-ia64 list either. Avi> btw, we can probably shorten the names to kvm@ and kvm-$arch@ Avi> while we're at it. Either way works IMHO. Cheers, Jes |
|
From: Hollis B. <ho...@us...> - 2008-04-24 16:38:04
|
On Thursday 24 April 2008 07:54:10 Avi Kivity wrote: > I propose moving the kvm lists to vger.kernel.org, for the following > benefits: > > - better spam control > - faster service (I see significant lag with the sourceforge lists) > - no ads appended to the end of each email > > If no objections are raised, and if the vger postmasters agree, I will > mass subscribe the current subscribers so that there will be no service > interruption. Sounds good to me. Will we continue to have manual moderation for non-subscribers? That seems to be a good way to handle the last 1% of spam that sneaks through the automated filters. -- Hollis Blanchard IBM Linux Technology Center |
|
From: Avi K. <av...@qu...> - 2008-04-27 09:40:44
|
Avi Kivity wrote: > I propose moving the kvm lists to vger.kernel.org, for the following > benefits: > > - better spam control > - faster service (I see significant lag with the sourceforge lists) > - no ads appended to the end of each email > > If no objections are raised, and if the vger postmasters agree, I will > mass subscribe the current subscribers so that there will be no > service interruption. > Since no objections were raised, we'll start to get this rolling. -- error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function |
|
From: David M. <da...@da...> - 2008-04-29 10:30:08
|
From: Avi Kivity <av...@qu...> Date: Sun, 27 Apr 2008 12:40:29 +0300 > Avi Kivity wrote: > > I propose moving the kvm lists to vger.kernel.org, for the following > > benefits: > > > > - better spam control > > - faster service (I see significant lag with the sourceforge lists) > > - no ads appended to the end of each email > > > > If no objections are raised, and if the vger postmasters agree, I will > > mass subscribe the current subscribers so that there will be no > > service interruption. > > > > Since no objections were raised, we'll start to get this rolling. Should I create the list(s) now? If so, please let me know the names they should have. Thanks. |
|
From: Avi K. <av...@qu...> - 2008-04-29 21:47:43
|
David Miller wrote: > Should I create the list(s) now? If so, please let me know the > names they should have. > I sent an email a couple of days ago to pos...@vg...: > Hi, please create the following lists for kvm: > > kvm (x86 and general discussion) > kvm-ppc (powerpc, managed by Hollis Blanchard) > kvm-ia64 (ia64) > kvm-commits (read-only, tracks commits to kvm git HEAD) > > Thanks. Thanks. -- Any sufficiently difficult bug is indistinguishable from a feature. |
|
From: David M. <da...@da...> - 2008-04-30 03:14:47
|
From: Avi Kivity <av...@qu...> Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2008 00:46:13 +0300 > I sent an email a couple of days ago to pos...@vg...: > > > Hi, please create the following lists for kvm: > > > > kvm (x86 and general discussion) > > kvm-ppc (powerpc, managed by Hollis Blanchard) > > kvm-ia64 (ia64) > > kvm-commits (read-only, tracks commits to kvm git HEAD) > > > > Thanks. I've created (and tested) all of these lists. |
|
From: Avi K. <av...@qu...> - 2008-04-30 12:57:09
|
David Miller wrote: > I've created (and tested) all of these lists. > > Thanks. I about a week I'll make the sourceforge lists read-only. -- Any sufficiently difficult bug is indistinguishable from a feature. |
Thanks for helping keep SourceForge clean.
X