From: Alan G. <ag...@sp...> - 2009-04-22 06:26:50
|
Dragging a new part onto a logic circuit sets many/most of the gates to random states. =\ I was trying to build a dac the hard way. =P damn my circuit got huge, On the order of 3 dozen parts! =0 damn glitchy too, note the dangling junction node. =((( I'm really going to have to take a crowbar to all those classes. =\ Lemme know if you want the circuit, it's certainly way bigger than mailing list limits! -- New president: Here we go again... Chemistry.com: A total rip-off. Powers are not rights. |
From: Chitlesh G. <chi...@wa...> - 2009-04-22 08:12:53
|
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 7:19 AM, Alan Grimes <ag...@sp...> wrote: > Lemme know if you want the circuit, it's certainly way bigger than > mailing list limits! Hello Alan, I wish to have it. I'm gathering circuits to build a testsuite for ktechlab. Thus I can evaluate and test ktechlab before releasing to fedora stable repositories. regards Chitlesh |
From: P Z. <zol...@gm...> - 2009-04-23 15:26:53
|
On Wed, 22 Apr 2009 07:19:54 +0200, Alan Grimes <ag...@sp...> wrote: > Dragging a new part onto a logic circuit sets many/most of the gates to > random states. =\ > > I was trying to build a dac the hard way. =P damn my circuit got huge, > On the order of 3 dozen parts! =0 > > damn glitchy too, note the dangling junction node. =((( > > I'm really going to have to take a crowbar to all those classes. =\ > > Lemme know if you want the circuit, it's certainly way bigger than > mailing list limits! > What about uploading the circuit to the wiki? Like here: http://ktechlab.org/wiki/index.php?title=Index:Circuits |