I know my opinion may not matter much here. But if it were I, I would leave the names of those that originally invented the program.  Either for just legacy reason or perhaps down the line they want to come back (who knows). But it should in my view be under former maintainers / developers for now.

+ 1

On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 4:13 AM, Juan De Vincenzo <juandevincenzo@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi there,

As I discussed with Julian and Alan over IRC yesterday, I'll be
working on a modification that I can actually do, which is updating
the names in the about section, that's why I would like to request the
complete list of names that should be in there. It would be great if
it includes the role for each one. =)

I've been also thinking that, of course, David Saxton and and Daniel
Clarke should be left there, but under a tag which I thought could be
something like "Original Development", while the current team could be
identified as the "Currently Active Developers/Team".

Let me know your thoughts/seggestions about this.


Open Source Business Conference (OSBC), March 24-25, 2009, San Francisco, CA
-OSBC tackles the biggest issue in open source: Open Sourcing the Enterprise
-Strategies to boost innovation and cut costs with open source participation
-Receive a $600 discount off the registration fee with the source code: SFAD
Ktechlab-devel mailing list