Menu
▾
▴
kshowmail-user — User forum for kshowmail related discussions
You can subscribe to this list here.
| 2002 |
Jan
|
Feb
(13) |
Mar
(22) |
Apr
(2) |
May
(4) |
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2003 |
Jan
|
Feb
(20) |
Mar
(2) |
Apr
(1) |
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
(1) |
Sep
(3) |
Oct
(2) |
Nov
|
Dec
(7) |
| 2004 |
Jan
(1) |
Feb
(2) |
Mar
(2) |
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2005 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
(1) |
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
(4) |
| 2006 |
Jan
(1) |
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2007 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
(6) |
Aug
(1) |
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2009 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
(1) |
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2011 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
(3) |
Jul
(2) |
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
|
From: Ulrich W. <ulr...@gm...> - 2011-07-09 18:10:47
|
Hi Ahron,
I'm the current developer of KShowmail. I know the problem and I will try to solve it in the next release.
Regards
Ulrich Weigelt
Am Dienstag, 5. Juli 2011, 13:22:06 schrieb egg...@be...:
> Hello Aharon,
>
> I think so, yes. I forward this mail to the mailing list.
>
> Regards
> Eggert
>
>
>
> ----- ursprüngliche Nachricht ---------
>
> Subject: Re: [Kshowmail-user] kshowmail and iso-8859-8
> Date: Di 05 Jul 2011 07:42:53 CEST
> From: Aharon Schkolnik<sch...@01...>
> To: Ehmke Eggert<egg...@be...>
>
>
>
> p, li { white-space: pre-wrap; }
>
> I'm not a programmer/developer, so I hope I understood what I read:
>
>
> - The problem I described is known and solveable.
> - The solution in python is pretty trivial.
> - The solution for kshowmail is not trivial, but neither is it rocket science
> - The problem in kmail can be solved, but someone has to do the work.
>
>
>
>
> So, would the "right thing to do" be to submit a feature request somewhere?
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Wednesday, June 29, 2011, you wrote:
> > Hello Aharon,
> >
> > maybe this gives a hint:
> > http://www.velocityreviews.com/forums/t344029-to-decode-the-subject-iso-
> > 8859-2-q-in-email-in-python.html
> >
> > Regards
> > Eggert
> >
> >
> >
> > ----- ursprüngliche Nachricht ---------
> >
> > Subject: [Kshowmail-user] kshowmail and iso-8859-8
> > Date: Mi 29 Jun 2011 10:44:45 CEST
> > From: Aharon Schkolnik<sch...@01...>
> > To: Ksh...@li...
> >
> >
> >
> > p, li { white-space: pre-wrap; }
> >
> > Hi.
> >
> >
> > Anyone know if there is any way to get kshowmail to correctly handle
> > Subject header like the one below:
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Subject: =?iso-8859-8?b?+ezl7Q==?= =?iso-8859-8?b?IPLs6evt?=
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > (This is a subject written in Hebrew, and it is not displayed in the
> > kshowmail window in Hebrew. Gnubiff, for example displays the subject
> > correctly.)
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > TIA.
>
>
>
>
>
|
|
From: <egg...@be...> - 2011-07-05 11:22:19
|
Hello Aharon,
I think so, yes. I forward this mail to the mailing list.
Regards
Eggert
----- ursprüngliche Nachricht ---------
Subject: Re: [Kshowmail-user] kshowmail and iso-8859-8
Date: Di 05 Jul 2011 07:42:53 CEST
From: Aharon Schkolnik<sch...@01...>
To: Ehmke Eggert<egg...@be...>
p, li { white-space: pre-wrap; }
I'm not a programmer/developer, so I hope I understood what I read:
- The problem I described is known and solveable.
- The solution in python is pretty trivial.
- The solution for kshowmail is not trivial, but neither is it rocket science
- The problem in kmail can be solved, but someone has to do the work.
So, would the "right thing to do" be to submit a feature request somewhere?
On Wednesday, June 29, 2011, you wrote:
> Hello Aharon,
>
> maybe this gives a hint:
> http://www.velocityreviews.com/forums/t344029-to-decode-the-subject-iso-
> 8859-2-q-in-email-in-python.html
>
> Regards
> Eggert
>
>
>
> ----- ursprüngliche Nachricht ---------
>
> Subject: [Kshowmail-user] kshowmail and iso-8859-8
> Date: Mi 29 Jun 2011 10:44:45 CEST
> From: Aharon Schkolnik<sch...@01...>
> To: Ksh...@li...
>
>
>
> p, li { white-space: pre-wrap; }
>
> Hi.
>
>
> Anyone know if there is any way to get kshowmail to correctly handle
> Subject header like the one below:
>
>
>
>
> Subject: =?iso-8859-8?b?+ezl7Q==?= =?iso-8859-8?b?IPLs6evt?=
>
>
>
>
> (This is a subject written in Hebrew, and it is not displayed in the
> kshowmail window in Hebrew. Gnubiff, for example displays the subject
> correctly.)
>
>
>
>
> TIA.
--
The day is short, and the work is great, | Aharon Schkolnik
and the laborers are lazy, and the reward |
is great, and the Master of the house is | asc...@gm...
impatient. - Ethics Of The Fathers Ch. 2 | 054 3344135
---- ursprüngliche Nachricht Ende ----
|
|
From: Ehmke E. <egg...@be...> - 2011-06-29 10:49:39
|
Hello Aharon, maybe this gives a hint: http://www.velocityreviews.com/forums/t344029-to-decode-the-subject-iso-8859-2-q-in-email-in-python.html Regards Eggert ----- ursprüngliche Nachricht --------- Subject: [Kshowmail-user] kshowmail and iso-8859-8 Date: Mi 29 Jun 2011 10:44:45 CEST From: Aharon Schkolnik<sch...@01...> To: Ksh...@li... p, li { white-space: pre-wrap; } Hi. Anyone know if there is any way to get kshowmail to correctly handle Subject header like the one below: Subject: =?iso-8859-8?b?+ezl7Q==?= =?iso-8859-8?b?IPLs6evt?= (This is a subject written in Hebrew, and it is not displayed in the kshowmail window in Hebrew. Gnubiff, for example displays the subject correctly.) TIA. -- The day is short, and the work is great, | Aharon Schkolnik and the laborers are lazy, and the reward | is great, and the Master of the house is | asc...@gm... impatient. - Ethics Of The Fathers Ch. 2 | 054 3344135 ---- ursprüngliche Nachricht Ende ---- |
|
From: Aharon S. <sch...@01...> - 2011-06-29 08:43:16
|
Hi. Anyone know if there is any way to get kshowmail to correctly handle Subject header like the one below: Subject: =?iso-8859-8?b?+ezl7Q==?= =?iso-8859-8?b?IPLs6evt?= (This is a subject written in Hebrew, and it is not displayed in the kshowmail window in Hebrew. Gnubiff, for example displays the subject correctly.) TIA. -- The day is short, and the work is great, | Aharon Schkolnik and the laborers are lazy, and the reward | is great, and the Master of the house is | asc...@gm... impatient. - Ethics Of The Fathers Ch. 2 | 054 3344135 |
|
From: Ulrich W. <ulr...@gm...> - 2011-06-26 11:48:22
|
Hi! We have released KShowmail 4.1. Please see here: http://sourceforge.net/projects/kshowmail/ or here: http://kde-apps.org/content/show.php/KShowmail?content=61892 to get it. Best regards Ulrich Weigelt |
|
From: Aharon S. <asc...@gm...> - 2009-03-22 20:11:32
|
Hi. Has anyone managed to get kshowmail to work under Fedora 10? I really like it ,but have been unable to build it under Fedora 10. TIA ! -- The day is short, and the work is great, | Aharon Schkolnik and the laborers are lazy, and the reward | is great, and the Master of the house is | asc...@gm... impatient. - Ethics Of The Fathers Ch. 2 | 054 3344135 |
|
From: Scott B. <sco...@co...> - 2007-08-05 12:30:26
|
The first unstable pre-release for version 3.3 has been released to sourceforge, kshowmail-3.2.9.1. This release adds support for SSL/TLS. |
|
From: Ulrich W. <ulr...@gm...> - 2007-07-25 15:25:10
|
Yes, I think it is the best way. Remove the rpm package and install it from the source tarball. Attention! Your account settings will be lost because I have changed the config file. Wireshark (Ethereal is the old name of it) is a network sniffer. It grabs all IP packets and show they in a concise list. In this way you can watch the communication between client and server and find failures. It is delivered with openSuSE. Ulrich Am Dienstag, 24. Juli 2007 21:24 schrieben Sie: > Thanks again Ulrich, > > I am sorry to bother you with elementary stuff, but I see that there is > no X86-64 version on 3.2.1. Would this mean uninstalling 3.1.2 > completely then installing 3.2.1 fresh? > > I do not know Wireshark or Ethereal, but I will look them up. > > Best wishes, > > Robin > > Ulrich Weigelt wrote: > > Hi, > > > >> However, I am happy to upgrade if you think I should now do that. > > > > Yes, do that. > > I'm more familiar with the new version, because 3.1.2 is almost > > completely made by Eggert. > > But it is difficult to find the error, because I can not reproduce it on > > my system. Can you test it with another account to isolate the source of > > the failure? A network dump would be helpful, too. Do you know > > Wireshark/Ethereal? > > > > Regards, > > > > Ulrich > > > > Am Dienstag, 24. Juli 2007 18:21 schrieben Sie: > >> Hello again Ulrich, > >> > >> Thanks for your quick response. No, I only have one account, so this is > >> happening without multiple accounts. > >> > >> I did see that there was a new version available, but I did not want to > >> change things while you were investigating. However, I am happy to > >> upgrade if you think I should now do that. > >> > >> Kind regards, > >> > >> Robin > >> > >> Ulrich Weigelt wrote: > >>> Hi Robin, > >>> > >>> Ok, this time out is determined by KShowmail itself. > >>> Do you request more as one account? In this case, it would be > >>> interesting to know whether just one or all accounts cause this > >>> failure. Please activate just one at a time and watch the behaviour. > >>> You could also install the newest version 3.2.1 (see at Sourceforge). > >>> In this I have revised the complete network part. I don't think this > >>> will solve your problem, because both versions use the same KDE library > >>> for the actual POP3 operation. But it shows your a more detailed time > >>> out message inclusive of the account name. Also you can switch off the > >>> error messages :o). > >>> > >>> Regards, > >>> > >>> Ulrich > >>> > >>> Am Dienstag, 24. Juli 2007 09:32 schrieben Sie: > >>>> Hello Ulrich, > >>>> > >>>> I have just returned from a short holiday and found your kind reply, > >>>> thank you. > >>>> > >>>> Since I returned, the problem has slightly improved, although the > >>>> timeout message still occurs quite frequently. The exact form of it > >>>> is a simple message box with the words "POP3 Timeout" - no more. > >>>> > >>>> I am running KShowmail 3.1.2, using KDE 3.5.5, release 45.4 on > >>>> openSUSE 10.2 (2.6.18.8-0.5-X86-64). I used the rpm package > >>>> kshowmail-3.1.2-2.su102.x86_64.rpm to install. > >>>> > >>>> Although I am a relative newcomer to Linux, I will do whatever I can > >>>> to assist you and I am grateful for your help on what looks like a > >>>> very useful program. > >>>> > >>>> Kind regards, > >>>> > >>>> Robin > >>>> > >>>> Ulrich Weigelt wrote: > >>>>> Hi Robin, > >>>>> > >>>>>>> KShowmail is very slow to log in. I have set the timeout to 60 > >>>>>>> seconds, but 90% of the time, it will still time out, although on > >>>>>>> rare occasions it is quite fast. I do not have this problem with > >>>>>>> Thunderbird. > >>>>> > >>>>> Could you send me the accurate time out message? There are two kinds > >>>>> of time out which are important for the login. The first one is > >>>>> handled by the network subsystem of linux and the second one is build > >>>>> in KShowmail. The latter is just used to ensure a stable work if the > >>>>> network doesn't report its timeout in time or the used KDE network > >>>>> library works incorrect. > >>>>> > >>>>> Ulrich > >>>>> > >>>>> Am Samstag, 14. Juli 2007 02:22 schrieb Eggert Ehmke: > >>>>>> Hello Robin, > >>>>>> > >>>>>> to help you we need the version of kshowmail you are running, the > >>>>>> Linux distro you are using and the installation method (source, rpm) > >>>>>> you used to install kshowmail. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Regards > >>>>>> Eggert > >>>>>> > >>>>>> On Fri, 06 Jul 2007 22:33:04 +0100, Robin Simmons > >>>>>> > >>>>>> <ro...@le...> wrote: > >>>>>>> Hello Eggert, > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> I have been trying to find a replacement for Mailwasher as I have > >>>>>>> now transferred all my internet services from Windows to Linux. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> KShowmail looks very useful but I have a couple of comments. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> KShowmail is very slow to log in. I have set the timeout to 60 > >>>>>>> seconds, but 90% of the time, it will still time out, although on > >>>>>>> rare occasions it is quite fast. I do not have this problem with > >>>>>>> Thunderbird. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> I sometimes need to look at the first few lines of a message if I > >>>>>>> am in doubt about whether it is spam. I cannot find a way to do > >>>>>>> this in a reasonable time. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Thunderbird's spam filtering is not very effective and requires the > >>>>>>> spam to be downloaded before filtering. Mailwasher had all the > >>>>>>> facilities required, although its actions seemed not always to > >>>>>>> follow the defined rejection rules. Otherwise is is a good model > >>>>>>> on which to base KShowmail. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Kind regards, > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Robin Simmons > >>>>>> > >>>>>> -------------------------------------------------------------------- > >>>>>>-- -- - This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express > >>>>>> Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take > >>>>>> control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. > >>>>>> http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/ > >>>>>> _______________________________________________ > >>>>>> Kshowmail-devel mailing list > >>>>>> Ksh...@li... > >>>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kshowmail-devel -- Achtung Werbung!: http://sourceforge.net/projects/kshowmail http://sourceforge.net/projects/rosenkoenig www.kevinundkell.de |
|
From: Ulrich W. <ulr...@gm...> - 2007-07-24 17:03:24
|
Hi, > However, I am happy to upgrade if you think I should now do that. Yes, do that. I'm more familiar with the new version, because 3.1.2 is almost completely made by Eggert. But it is difficult to find the error, because I can not reproduce it on my system. Can you test it with another account to isolate the source of the failure? A network dump would be helpful, too. Do you know Wireshark/Ethereal? Regards, Ulrich Am Dienstag, 24. Juli 2007 18:21 schrieben Sie: > Hello again Ulrich, > > Thanks for your quick response. No, I only have one account, so this is > happening without multiple accounts. > > I did see that there was a new version available, but I did not want to > change things while you were investigating. However, I am happy to > upgrade if you think I should now do that. > > Kind regards, > > Robin > > Ulrich Weigelt wrote: > > Hi Robin, > > > > Ok, this time out is determined by KShowmail itself. > > Do you request more as one account? In this case, it would be interesting > > to know whether just one or all accounts cause this failure. Please > > activate just one at a time and watch the behaviour. > > You could also install the newest version 3.2.1 (see at Sourceforge). In > > this I have revised the complete network part. I don't think this will > > solve your problem, because both versions use the same KDE library for > > the actual POP3 operation. But it shows your a more detailed time out > > message inclusive of the account name. Also you can switch off the error > > messages :o). > > > > Regards, > > > > Ulrich > > > > Am Dienstag, 24. Juli 2007 09:32 schrieben Sie: > >> Hello Ulrich, > >> > >> I have just returned from a short holiday and found your kind reply, > >> thank you. > >> > >> Since I returned, the problem has slightly improved, although the > >> timeout message still occurs quite frequently. The exact form of it is > >> a simple message box with the words "POP3 Timeout" - no more. > >> > >> I am running KShowmail 3.1.2, using KDE 3.5.5, release 45.4 on openSUSE > >> 10.2 (2.6.18.8-0.5-X86-64). I used the rpm package > >> kshowmail-3.1.2-2.su102.x86_64.rpm to install. > >> > >> Although I am a relative newcomer to Linux, I will do whatever I can to > >> assist you and I am grateful for your help on what looks like a very > >> useful program. > >> > >> Kind regards, > >> > >> Robin > >> > >> Ulrich Weigelt wrote: > >>> Hi Robin, > >>> > >>>>> KShowmail is very slow to log in. I have set the timeout to 60 > >>>>> seconds, but 90% of the time, it will still time out, although on > >>>>> rare occasions it is quite fast. I do not have this problem with > >>>>> Thunderbird. > >>> > >>> Could you send me the accurate time out message? There are two kinds of > >>> time out which are important for the login. The first one is handled by > >>> the network subsystem of linux and the second one is build in > >>> KShowmail. The latter is just used to ensure a stable work if the > >>> network doesn't report its timeout in time or the used KDE network > >>> library works incorrect. > >>> > >>> Ulrich > >>> > >>> Am Samstag, 14. Juli 2007 02:22 schrieb Eggert Ehmke: > >>>> Hello Robin, > >>>> > >>>> to help you we need the version of kshowmail you are running, the > >>>> Linux distro you are using and the installation method (source, rpm) > >>>> you used to install kshowmail. > >>>> > >>>> Regards > >>>> Eggert > >>>> > >>>> On Fri, 06 Jul 2007 22:33:04 +0100, Robin Simmons > >>>> > >>>> <ro...@le...> wrote: > >>>>> Hello Eggert, > >>>>> > >>>>> I have been trying to find a replacement for Mailwasher as I have now > >>>>> transferred all my internet services from Windows to Linux. > >>>>> > >>>>> KShowmail looks very useful but I have a couple of comments. > >>>>> > >>>>> KShowmail is very slow to log in. I have set the timeout to 60 > >>>>> seconds, but 90% of the time, it will still time out, although on > >>>>> rare occasions it is quite fast. I do not have this problem with > >>>>> Thunderbird. > >>>>> > >>>>> I sometimes need to look at the first few lines of a message if I am > >>>>> in doubt about whether it is spam. I cannot find a way to do this in > >>>>> a reasonable time. > >>>>> > >>>>> Thunderbird's spam filtering is not very effective and requires the > >>>>> spam to be downloaded before filtering. Mailwasher had all the > >>>>> facilities required, although its actions seemed not always to follow > >>>>> the defined rejection rules. Otherwise is is a good model on which > >>>>> to base KShowmail. > >>>>> > >>>>> Kind regards, > >>>>> > >>>>> Robin Simmons > >>>> > >>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > >>>>-- - This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express > >>>> Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take > >>>> control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. > >>>> http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/ > >>>> _______________________________________________ > >>>> Kshowmail-devel mailing list > >>>> Ksh...@li... > >>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kshowmail-devel -- Achtung Werbung!: http://sourceforge.net/projects/kshowmail http://sourceforge.net/projects/rosenkoenig www.kevinundkell.de |
|
From: Eggert E. <egg...@be...> - 2007-07-15 13:22:40
|
The package is on the sourceforge server. http://sourceforge.net/projects/kshowmail/ Regards Eggert |
|
From: Scott B. <sco...@co...> - 2007-07-15 12:20:00
|
Release Notes for Kshowmail 14 July 2007 Version 3.2.1 This release is a minor bugfix to 3.2.0. Fixed bug where if you configure 2 accounts, retrieve mail, and then deactivate one of the accounts, it's number of messages still reflects in the tray icon. Fixed sort of message number and size columns in message list to be numerical rather than alpha. Corrected version displayed in the About dialog. |
|
From: Eggert E. <egg...@be...> - 2007-07-14 16:33:27
|
Hello Kshowmail Friends, you might have noticed that I moved you from the kshowmail-announce mailing list to kshowmail-user. The kshowmail-announce mailing list will be deleted shortly. New versions and features will be announced and discussed in the kshowmail-users mailing list. All developers are also on that list. So I hope to encourage the discussion between users and developers again, as the kshowmail development right now is getting new momentum. The project lives on, after all! Our new developer Ulrich Weigelt and Scott Barninger who does the packaging are doing a great job. I want to take the opportunity to say "thank you" for all the constructive feedback I got from you. Some of your ideas may still come to reality. If you are no longer interested in the kshowmail development, please feel free to cancel the subscription. Kind Regards Eggert |
|
From: Karl T. <kar...@sb...> - 2007-07-14 16:24:54
|
Kshowmail is great, but my ISP is starting to require all users to use secure SSL port 995 access to their POP3 mail accounts. Kshowmail does not seem to want to work unless it is set up to use POP3 port 110 . . . which very shortly I will no longer be able to use . . . ? Thank you, Karl Tipple Register Linux User # 412551 |
|
From: Amado M. <ygu...@es...> - 2006-01-04 16:20:42
|
St ock Alert iPackets International, Inc. Global Developer and Provider of a Wide Range of Wireless and Communications Solutions for Selected Enterprises Including Mine-Safety (Source: News 1/3/06) OTC: IPKL Price: .35 Huge PR For Wednesday is Underway on IPKL. Short/Day Trading Opportunity for You? Sometimes it is Bang-Zoom on These Small st ocks..As Many of You may Know Recent News: Go Read the Full Stories Now! 1)iPackets International Receives US$85,000 Down Payment for Its First iPMine Deployment in China 2)iPackets International Attends Several Mining Trade Shows and Receives Tremendous Response for Its iPMine Mine-Safety Product Watch This One Trade on Wednesday! Radar it Right Now.. _______________ Information within this email contains 4rward l00 king sta tements within meaning of Section 27A of the Sec urities Act of nineteen thirty three and Section 21B of the Se curities Exchange Act of nineteen thirty four. Any statements that express or involve discussions with respect to predictions, expectations, beliefs, plans, projections, objectives, goals, assumptions future events or performance are not statements of historical fact and may be 4rward 1o0king statements. 4rward looking statements are based on ex pectations, es timates and pr ojections at the time the statements are that involve a number of risks and uncertainties which could cause actual results or events to differ materially from those presently featured Com pany is not a reporting company under the SEC Act of 1934 and there is limited information available on the company. The Co-mpany has a nominal ca sh position.It is an operating company. The company is going to need financing. If that financing does not occur, the company may not be able to continue as a going concern in which case you could lose your in-vestment. The pu blisher of this new sletter does not represent that the information contained in this mes sage states all material facts or does not omit a material fact necessary to make the statements therein not misleading. All information provided within this e_ mail pertaining to in-vesting, st 0cks, se curities must be understood as information provided and not inv estment advice. Remember a thorough due diligence effort, including a review of a company's filings when available, should be completed prior to in_vesting. The pub lisher of this news letter advises all readers and subscribers to seek advice from a registered professional securities representative before deciding to trade in st0cks featured this e mail. None of the material within this report shall be construed as any kind of in_vestment advice or solicitation. Many of these com panies on the verge of bankruptcy. You can lose all your mony by inv esting in st 0ck. The publisher of this new sletter is not a registered in-vestment advis0r. Subscribers should not view information herein as legal, tax, accounting or inve stment advice. In com pliance with the Securities Act of nineteen thirty three, Section 17(b),The publisher of this newsletter is contracted to receive fifteen th0 usand d0 l1ars from a third party, not an off icer, dir ector or af filiate shar eh0lder for the ci rculation of this report. Be aware of an inherent conflict of interest resulting from such compensation due to the fact that this is a paid advertisement and is not without bias. All factual information in this report was gathered from public sources, including but not limited to Co mpany Press Releases. Use of the information in this e mail constitutes your acceptance of these terms. |
|
From: Charlene L. <qa...@ms...> - 2005-12-22 22:06:40
|
Explosive St=ck Alert Doll Technology Group Inc. Global Manufacturer and Marketer of "Clean & Green" Products and Technology Solutions(Source: News 12/6/05) OTC: DTGP Price: .14 Huge PR Campaign Underway For Thursday's Trading **DTGP** Can You Make Some Fast Money On This One? RECENT NEWS: Go Read The Full Stories Right Nowii 1)Doll Technology Group Begins U.S. Trials of AquaBoost(TM) 2)Doll Technology Group Announces Strategic Partnership With Land and Sea Development to Market BlazeTamer(TM) Fire Retardant Product- Initial Purchase Order Valued at Over $1.1 Million RedBrooks Laboratory, a DTGP subsidiary, is a full service independent facility that tests, qualifies and certifies all Doll Technology Group's products and services. The laboratory is one of the few government certified facilities for the testing of fire suppression systems for the aerospace, maritime, and general industries. (Source: News 12/2/05) Watch This One Trade on Thursday Radar it Right Now.. information within this email contains 4rward l00king statements within the m eaning of Sect ion twenty seven A of the Securities Act of nin eteen thirty three and Section twenty oneB of the Secu rities Exch ange Act of nineteen thirty four. Any statements that expr ess or involve discuss ions with respect to predi ctions, exp ectations, belie fs, pl ans, proj ections, objectives, g oals, assumpt ions or future events or perf ormance are not stat ements of his torical fact and may be 4 rward 1o0king statem ents. 4 rward looking stat ements are based on e xpectations, estimates and proj ections at the time the stat ements are made that in volve a nu mber of ri sks and uncer tainties wh ich could cause actual res ults or eve nts to dif fer mate rially from those p resently anticipa ted.Today's fea tured Compa ny is not a repr ting compan y und er the SEC Act of ninteen thirty four and theref ore there is limi ted inform tion availab le on the com pany. As with many micr ocap st=cks, today's company has dis closable material items you need to consider in order to make an informed and intelligent in_vestment decision. These items include: A nominal cash position. it is an operating Company. The company is going to need financing. if that financing does not occur, the company may not be able to continue as a going concern in which case you could lose your entire in-vestment. The publisher of this newsletter does not represent that the informa tion contained in this message states all ma terial facts or does not omit a mat erial fact neces sary to make the state ments therein not misle ading. All in formation provided within this e_ mail perta ining to in- vesting, st=cks, securities must be understood as informat ion provi ded and not in vest ment advice. Remember a tho rough due dilige nce effort, inc luding a review of a comp any's filings when available, should be compl eted prior to in_ vesting. The pu blisher of this newsletter advises all read ers and subs cribers to seek adv ice from a reg istered profe ssional secu rities re presentative before deciding to trade in st=cks featured within this e_ mail. None of the mat erial within this repo rt shall be co nstrued as any kind of in_vestment advice or solicitation. Many of these companies are on the verge of bankruptcy. You can lose all your mony by inv esting in this st=ck. The publisher of this newsletter is not a regis tered in- vestment advis0r. Subscribers should not view information herein as legal, t x, account ing or in vestment advice. in comp liance with the Secur ities Act of nineteen thirty three, Section seventeen(b),The pu blisher of this newslet ter is cont racted to receive twel ve th0us and d0l lars from a third party, not an officer, director or affiliate shareh 0lder for the circul ation of this re port. Be aware of an inher ent conf lict of int erest resu lting from su ch compen sation due to the fact that this is a paid a vertisement and is not with out b ias.The pa rty that pa ys us has a pos ition in the st=ck they will sell at any time wi hout notice. This could have a nega tive im pact on the price of the st0ck, causing you to lose mony.Their intent ion is to sell now. All fa ctual inf ormation in this report was gathered from public sources,including but not limited to Company Press Releases. Use of the info rmation in this email cons titutes your accep tance of these terms. |
|
From: <in...@ux...> - 2005-12-06 01:03:27
|
$B!zL5NA$GM7$\$&!z%U%j!<%"%I%l%9$G4JC1EPO?(B!!
$BEPO?!&G/2qHq!"40A4L5NA(B
$B$7$+$b!"#1K|1_J,$NL5NA%]%$%s%HIU$-!#(B
$B#S#M!"%;%U%l$O$b$A$m$s$N$3$H!"!{!{$J4X78$^$G%G%-%A%c%&(B(^o^)
$BN/$^$C$FMh$?$i%3%3$GC5$7$F$M!*(B
$B!!"-"-"-"-"-"-"-"-(B
http://lo1.info/ffr/
$BCk4V$O?M:J$GCf=P$7!"Lk$O(BOL$B$GCf=P$7!"@8%(%C%A$7$?$$$J$i:#$9$0!z(B
$BL5NAEPO?!"#1K|1_J,L5NA!#(B
$B!!"-"-"-"-"-"-"-"-(B
http://lo1.info/ffr/
Moon Star Casino $B$G%+%8%N%2!<%`$r$7$F!"L5NA$G(B$100$B$r<u$1<h$m$&!*(B
http://hey2.info/casino/
$B:#8e5qH]$7$?$$J}$O(B hai...@ya... $B$X(B
|
|
From: Neateye <nit...@ao...> - 2005-06-20 04:58:07
|
Call out Gouranga be happy!!! Gouranga Gouranga Gouranga .... That which brings the highest happiness!! |
|
From: Michael M. <mmu...@hv...> - 2004-03-30 11:17:08
|
Hello Eggert, On Tuesday 30 March 2004 04:17, you wrote: > > the OptionDlg.cpp and OptionDlg.h files should be generated > automatically from OptionDlg.ui by the qt uic compiler. Please check: > is uic present in your $QTDIR/bin directory? Yes, it's there. > > You can savely delete OptionDlg.cpp and OptionDlg.h and rerun make. > Does that make a difference? Yes. It compiled! > It seems the files are part of the tarball where they should not be. Well ... After I wrote you, I tried recompiling the previously-installed version, 3.0.4, and got a similar error. Same with 3.0.5. The files are in the kshowmail subdirectory of each release. The fact that they compiled before and not now must be the result of KDE/QT upgrades on my part since I first installed your app. (??) Sincere thanks for your help and for KShowmail. Michael |
|
From: Michael M. <mmu...@hv...> - 2004-03-29 21:16:23
|
Hello, all. I've just downloaded the tarball for 3.1.0 to see if it solved some problems that I had with an earlier release. In an attempt to compile, I got the following error during the 'make' step. OptionDlg.cpp: In method `OptionDlg::OptionDlg (QWidget *, const char *, bool, unsigned int)': OptionDlg.cpp:54: `spacer4' undeclared (first use this function) OptionDlg.cpp:54: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in.) OptionDlg.cpp:78: `spacer2' undeclared (first use this function) OptionDlg.cpp:315: `Spacer70' undeclared (first use this function) make[2]: *** [OptionDlg.o] Error 1 make[2]: Leaving directory `/home/mm/downloads/KShowMail/kshowmail-3.1.0/kshowmail' make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/mm/downloads/KShowMail/kshowmail-3.1.0' make: *** [all] Error 2 I'm running redhat 7.3, qt-3.3.1-0, and kde-3.2.1. Any suggestions? Thanks, Michael |
|
From: The C. N. <lis...@ch...> - 2003-12-22 04:28:41
|
The ChessBrain Network T o be removed from our mailing list, send an email to su...@ch... Secure Your Place In History! On January 30th 2004 a single individual will battle the largest chess playing computer ever created! ChessBrain is virtual supercomputer which plays using the processing power of thousands of machines connected via the Internet. You can help ChessBrain by running our free software and participating in this Official Guiness World Record attempt. Every computer connected will help to make ChessBrain stronger! " It is similar to SETI@home .... The difference is that all that power is used, not in the search for extra-terrestrial life or to fold proteins, but to play the ancient game of chess. " - Linux.com Everyone who participates will be eligible to receive a printed certificate acknowledging their involvement! ChessBrain has become the first distributed computer in history to play chess using 846 computers from over 50 different countries. Register now! at http://www.chessbrain.net/reg.html Carlos Justiniano ChessBrain Founder cj...@ch... Cedric Griss ChessBrain Organizer ce...@DC... |
|
From: Gustavo Z. S. <gz...@ca...> - 2003-12-15 04:54:01
|
I did not see how to attach a file to the bug page.
Here is the shell script.
Good luck.
GZS
--
This Message is sent from my Red Hat 9.0 Linux server
.-. Gustavo Zamorano S.
.-. |
.-. | | Unique Computer Operations, S. A.
| | | | ___ (UNICOPSA)
| | | |/ _ \ ___
| /o\_'||.' o `.
| \=/ /|| `---' Celular: (507) 672-6487
\ ___// \
\____/ (`__') P.O. Box 872150, Zona 7
///////\\\\\\\ Panama, Republic of Panama
`--.____.--' mailto:gz...@ca...
Registered Linux user number 320898
Machine Registration number 205692
(at http://counter.li.org/)
|
|
From: <egg...@be...> - 2003-12-08 10:22:42
|
Your points about UIDL's are right, but there are some "buts": 1. the bug report I wrote to document the objections of Mike had another background. Mike has a "very large" number of mail on his server, 5000+. He started to delete some, and later he deleted again without refreshing in the meantime. When you have short lists of messages, like normal, the numbering on the server and in kshowmail are synced again. I guess with his lots of messages, this might take some time, and he started deleting again when the numbering was out of sync. My solution that is contained in 3.1.0-pre1 is to block all user input as long as the reindexing in kshowmail is not ready. 2. It is right that the UIDL is unique and will not change when other messages are deleted. In fact the UIDL is already used during the normal refresh to make sure the local list is in sync whith the server list. So essancially, according to your proposals, we should do a full refresh before each delete action. This can be done, but involves some redesign. Comments? Eggert > The only way to delete an email from the POP3 server during a POP3 > session is using its sequential number not its UIDL number. While a > pop3 session is active those sequential numbers are used. If we delete > some emails and close the session and reestablish a new POP3 session, > emails left on the email server will be sequentially renumbered starting > with 1. But their UIDL will be the same. > So, kshowmail needs to use those sequential numbers but first, it has to > recheck the UIDL in order to see if there was a sequential number change > and then readjust its own sequential numbers. > Kshowmail will need to be sure that both, the sequential number and UIDL > are both the same on the POP server as well on its own list. ALL of > that MUST be done during the same POP3 session. > > Steps to delete and email must be: > > -Establish a new POP3 session after a kshowmail list is created dring > a previuos session. > - Get a new list of emails from the POP3 server. > - Compare both the kshowmail sequential number and UIDL with those on > the new list. If the sequential numbers differ, then update kshowmail > sequential numbers and get the new sequential number for the email to be > deleted according to its UIDL. Then proceed to delete email using its > new sequential number. > - Then close session and show updated list. > > That is why I think that kshowmail should generate its own sequential > email numbering, no matter what sequential number an email will have in > the pop3 server. Kshowmail must keep pop3 sequential numbers hidden. In > that way kshowmail does not have to alert the user that there was a > sequential number change for some reason. Then, if user wants to delete > email number 3 of kshowmail list. It is going to be number 3 on > kshowmail list, no matter what number now it has on the POP3 because a > new session HAD to be established. If new emails have arrived > meanwhile, they have to be assigned following kshowmail own sequential > numbers, but > kshowmail should be refreshed and possible it will be necessary to alert > the user that some emails were deleted from the server by another > application. > > Now I see the picture in a clear way. > > GZS -- Diese Mail wurde versendet durch www.berlin.de |
|
From: Gustavo Z. S. <gz...@ca...> - 2003-12-08 05:54:02
|
The only way to delete an email from the POP3 server during a POP3 session is using its sequential number not its UIDL number. While a pop3 session is active those sequential numbers are used. If we delete some emails and close the session and reestablish a new POP3 session, emails left on the email server will be sequentially renumbered starting with 1. But their UIDL will be the same. So, kshowmail needs to use those sequential numbers but first, it has to recheck the UIDL in order to see if there was a sequential number change and then readjust its own sequential numbers. Kshowmail will need to be sure that both, the sequential number and UIDL are both the same on the POP server as well on its own list. ALL of that MUST be done during the same POP3 session. Steps to delete and email must be: -Establish a new POP3 session after a kshowmail list is created dring a previuos session. - Get a new list of emails from the POP3 server. - Compare both the kshowmail sequential number and UIDL with those on the new list. If the sequential numbers differ, then update kshowmail sequential numbers and get the new sequential number for the email to be deleted according to its UIDL. Then proceed to delete email using its new sequential number. - Then close session and show updated list. That is why I think that kshowmail should generate its own sequential email numbering, no matter what sequential number an email will have in the pop3 server. Kshowmail must keep pop3 sequential numbers hidden. In that way kshowmail does not have to alert the user that there was a sequential number change for some reason. Then, if user wants to delete email number 3 of kshowmail list. It is going to be number 3 on kshowmail list, no matter what number now it has on the POP3 because a new session HAD to be established. If new emails have arrived meanwhile, they have to be assigned following kshowmail own sequential numbers, but kshowmail should be refreshed and possible it will be necessary to alert the user that some emails were deleted from the server by another application. Now I see the picture in a clear way. GZS Gustavo Zamorano S. wrote: > Well. Article says that if you do not want your emails deleted, do not > use kshowmail. > I think it is not that way. In my case, I am the only one that has the > password for my email account. Mozilla is set to not to check for > emails automatically. I check for new emails first with kshowmail, and > after I deleted unwanted and kshowmail's spam filters trapped emails, > then I get wanted emails from my pop server with Mozilla and Mozilla > will delete the whole list from the server. There is no way kshowmail > will delete emails by mistake. > > I think that probabilities that kshowmail will delete other emails by > mistake will only occurr if: > > - More than one user receive emails in the same email address. > - The email client will delete some emails, not all from the pop server. > > Oh! Now that I am thinking about this problem, I found a potencial way > that it will really happen. Let me see... Yes. It happens: > > - Kshowmail checks for new emails and for example it finds 3 new emails. > - I run Mozilla Mail and get those three new emails. Mozilla deletes > those 3 emails from the pop server. > - Kshowmail still thinks that I have 3 new emails as per its own list > - Let's say I forget that I have already downloaded those 3 emails with > Mozilla. Then I return to kshowmail and see those 3 new emails there. > - I decide to delete the first one ( email number 1). > - But, meanwhile a new email has arrived and it will be listed as number > 1 becasue my email box was empty. > - kshowmail proceeds to delete email number 1 > > - It will delete the new email. > > Then, The only way to be sure what email kshowmail will delete is > working with UIDLs the pop server assigns to each email and not with the > sequential numbers assigned for each pop session. > > Conclusion: numbers can be assigned by kshowmail after sorting by date > and time. That means that numbering emails is not important. Each > email should be treated by its unique UIDL number. > > GZS > > > ksh...@li... wrote: > >> Send Kshowmail-user mailing list submissions to >> ksh...@li... >> >> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kshowmail-user >> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to >> ksh...@li... >> >> You can reach the person managing the list at >> ksh...@li... >> >> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific >> than "Re: Contents of Kshowmail-user digest..." >> >> >> Today's Topics: >> >> 1. Re: About the email deletion bug published in MozillaQuest >> Magazine (Stephan Giesler) >> >> --__--__-- >> >> Message: 1 >> Date: Sun, 07 Dec 2003 11:45:20 -0300 >> From: Stephan Giesler <gi...@gm...> >> To: Ksh...@li... >> Subject: Re: [Kshowmail-user] About the email deletion bug published >> in MozillaQuest >> Magazine >> >> >> I don't agree. It's a very positive article, especially the comments >> on Eggert's effort. This kind of publicity is great for KSM, congrats! >> >> Stephan >> >> >> Gustavo Zamorano S. - 06/12/2003 22:04: >> >> >>> Those interested in this case, please read: >>> >>> http://mozillaquest.com/Linux03/KShowmail_Delete_Bug_Story01.html >>> Eggert is burning his brain trying to solve this problem. >>> >>> Words are hard on that article, i think. >>> >>> GZS >>> >>> >> >> > > -- This Message is sent from my Red Hat 9.0 Linux server Machine Registration number 205692 at http://counter.li.org/ .-. Gustavo Zamorano S. .-. | Registered Linux user number 320898 .-. | | at http://counter.li.org/ | | | | ___ | | | |/ _ \ ___ |
|
From: Gustavo Z. S. <gz...@ca...> - 2003-12-08 05:03:47
|
Well. Article says that if you do not want your emails deleted, do not use kshowmail. I think it is not that way. In my case, I am the only one that has the password for my email account. Mozilla is set to not to check for emails automatically. I check for new emails first with kshowmail, and after I deleted unwanted and kshowmail's spam filters trapped emails, then I get wanted emails from my pop server with Mozilla and Mozilla will delete the whole list from the server. There is no way kshowmail will delete emails by mistake. I think that probabilities that kshowmail will delete other emails by mistake will only occurr if: - More than one user receive emails in the same email address. - The email client will delete some emails, not all from the pop server. Oh! Now that I am thinking about this problem, I found a potencial way that it will really happen. Let me see... Yes. It happens: - Kshowmail checks for new emails and for example it finds 3 new emails. - I run Mozilla Mail and get those three new emails. Mozilla deletes those 3 emails from the pop server. - Kshowmail still thinks that I have 3 new emails as per its own list - Let's say I forget that I have already downloaded those 3 emails with Mozilla. Then I return to kshowmail and see those 3 new emails there. - I decide to delete the first one ( email number 1). - But, meanwhile a new email has arrived and it will be listed as number 1 becasue my email box was empty. - kshowmail proceeds to delete email number 1 - It will delete the new email. Then, The only way to be sure what email kshowmail will delete is working with UIDLs the pop server assigns to each email and not with the sequential numbers assigned for each pop session. Conclusion: numbers can be assigned by kshowmail after sorting by date and time. That means that numbering emails is not important. Each email should be treated by its unique UIDL number. GZS ksh...@li... wrote: > Send Kshowmail-user mailing list submissions to > ksh...@li... > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kshowmail-user > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > ksh...@li... > > You can reach the person managing the list at > ksh...@li... > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > than "Re: Contents of Kshowmail-user digest..." > > > Today's Topics: > > 1. Re: About the email deletion bug published in MozillaQuest > Magazine (Stephan Giesler) > > --__--__-- > > Message: 1 > Date: Sun, 07 Dec 2003 11:45:20 -0300 > From: Stephan Giesler <gi...@gm...> > To: Ksh...@li... > Subject: Re: [Kshowmail-user] About the email deletion bug published in MozillaQuest > Magazine > > > I don't agree. It's a very positive article, especially the comments on > Eggert's effort. This kind of publicity is great for KSM, congrats! > > Stephan > > > Gustavo Zamorano S. - 06/12/2003 22:04: > > >>Those interested in this case, please read: >> >>http://mozillaquest.com/Linux03/KShowmail_Delete_Bug_Story01.html >>Eggert is burning his brain trying to solve this problem. >> >>Words are hard on that article, i think. >> >>GZS >> >> > > -- This Message is sent from my Red Hat 9.0 Linux server Machine Registration number 205692 at http://counter.li.org/ .-. Gustavo Zamorano S. .-. | Registered Linux user number 320898 .-. | | at http://counter.li.org/ |
|
From: Stephan G. <gi...@gm...> - 2003-12-07 14:45:11
|
I don't agree. It's a very positive article, especially the comments on Eggert's effort. This kind of publicity is great for KSM, congrats! Stephan Gustavo Zamorano S. - 06/12/2003 22:04: > Those interested in this case, please read: > > http://mozillaquest.com/Linux03/KShowmail_Delete_Bug_Story01.html > Eggert is burning his brain trying to solve this problem. > > Words are hard on that article, i think. > > GZS > > -- ______________________________________________________________________ Stephan Giesler Av. Gral. Rivera 4725 / 204 11400 Montevideo Uruguay gi...@gm... Tel. +598-2-6197663 Fax +598-2-6198522 |
5 messages has been excluded from this view by a project administrator.
