#24 scrextend missing option cleardoublepage

[JohAna]

Hello,

I came across a problem with the package scrextend in Koma-Script 3.36. I did not find anything about this change in the release notes or the documentation, so I think it is a bug. If this change was on purpose please excuse my report.

This example works with Koma-Script 3.35:

\documentclass[twoside]{article}
\usepackage[cleardoublepage=plain]{scrextend}
\begin{document}
Some text.
\cleardoublepage
\end{document}

With Koma-Script 3.36 I get the error "unknown option 'cleardoublepage=plain' for package 'scrextend'.

Another observation I made was that without the option cleardoublepage=plain the example works with v. 3.36 but has a page number on the second page. It had no page number (empty) with v. 3.35.

It makes not difference, if I use lualatex or pdflatex.

The header of the log file using pdflatex (for version Informations):
This is pdfTeX, Version 3.141592653-2.6-1.40.24 (TeX Live 2022) (preloaded format=pdflatex 2022.5.9) 10 MAY 2022 08:27
entering extended mode
\write18 enabled.
%&-line parsing enabled.
min.tex
(./min.tex
LaTeX2e <2021-11-15> patch level 1
L3 programming layer <2022-05-04>

and lualatex:
This is LuaHBTeX, Version 1.15.0 (TeX Live 2022) (format=lualatex 2022.5.9) 10 MAY 2022 08:28
restricted system commands enabled.
min.tex
(./min.tex
LaTeX2e <2021-11-15> patch level 1

[Markus Kohm]

Yes, the missing option and moreover of the complete cleardoublepage code is a bug, happened while the big fat source reorganization, because there where not enough beta testers and currently there is no test case for this.

[Markus Kohm]

Should be fixed with [r3780]. Test to avoid the same bug again added in [r3781].

Fixed prerelease will be available soon .

[JohAna]

Thank you for the fast fix!

I confirm that r3781 works with the minimal example as well as our custom classes and packages.