On April 23, 2003 08:55 am, Jan T=F6njes wrote:
> @ List ....
>
> There are a few things I'd like to report / know....
>
> 1st --> The size of the main KMess window isn't saved when I close KMess.
> When I resize the window and close KMess (doesn't matter if close and then
> quit or quit directly) and reopen KMess, the size of the main window
> changed back.
>
It should save. It works for me.
> 2nd --> There are some i18n strings I can't translate. They are in the
> applications.cpp.
>
> Do you want to accept the file: XX ( XX bytes ) Do you want to accept or
> cancel.
>
> You have rejected the invitation
>
> This are the two I saw the other day. I don't know if there are more....
>
I'll check it out
> 3rd --> Arend sent a patch yesterday to the Mailinglist, adding this /me
> blablabla stuff to KMess. I think this is a nice small feature. I saw
> that it wasn't in CVS this morning (german time). Why? ;)
>
We haven't decided if we want that or not. I don't know if a /me thing is=
=20
really necessary. =20
If we do put it in, it won't be right now since we want to get things settl=
ed=20
for a 1.2 release. =20
> 4th --> There is a feature request "Toggleable status/event window" in the
> KMess Help-Forum (http://kmess.sourceforge.net/board/viewtopic.php?t=3D=
56).
> The guy requests to change the timestamps feature from:
>
> NICKNAME says: [Hour:Minute:Seconds]
>
> to
>
> [Hour:Minute:Seconds] NICKNAME says:
>
> He says that "the reason for this is becouse timestamps have always the
> same lenght while the nicknames not, so is more easy to follow timestamps
> on logs if they are putted at the start of the line..."
>
> What do you say to it?
>
I replied to that on the forums... Basically, the only one of us who uses t=
hat=20
timestamp is Michael and he likes it the way it is. So if it's something=20
that comes down to a developer's opinion over a user's opinion, the develop=
er=20
wins.
> Concerning the title of his topic he says:
>
> " It would be very useful to have a toggleable status/event window into
> wich log all events, such as contacts changing their status, going
> online/offline, going/returning from away and so on. Log should be done
> in the form "[timestamp] event", a little like trillian status window.
>
> This is useful because if you need to talk to a people wich at the mome=
nt
> is away (e.g. to lunch) and if you have a lot of things to do in the
> meantime, if you know when he/she went away you can nearly figure out when
> he/she will return and so you can manage better your time. "
>
That sounds like more trouble than it's worth. Maybe for 1.3 if we have=20
nothing else to do.
=20
> Opinion?
>
> Thank you :)
>
> Jan :)
|
