From: Peter A. <p_a...@ya...> - 2008-11-04 21:44:48
|
----- "Thomas Braun" <br...@ph...> wrote: > From: "Thomas Braun" <br...@ph...> > To: "Peter Ansell" <p_a...@ya...> > Cc: kil...@li... > Sent: Wednesday, 5 November, 2008 7:35:33 AM GMT +10:00 Brisbane > Subject: Re: [Kile-devel] Changing the list of file suffixes to delete > > Am Di, 4.11.2008, 22:30 schrieb Peter Ansell: > > > > ----- "Thomas Braun" <br...@ph...> wrote: > > > >> From: "Thomas Braun" <br...@ph...> > >> To: kil...@li... > >> Sent: Wednesday, 5 November, 2008 7:02:25 AM GMT +10:00 Brisbane > >> Subject: [Kile-devel] Changing the list of file suffixes to delete > >> > >> Hi there, > >> > >> in my opinion some file suffixes are missing in the "to clean > list". > >> Does anyone use handcrafted bbl files? If we should not add .bbl > as > >> suggested below. > >> > >> new: > >> .aux .bit .blg <.bbl> .lof .log .lot .glo <.glx .gxg .gxs> .idx > .ilg > >> .ind > >> <.out .url .svn> .toc > > > > Does this mean clean would wipe out .svn directories? That couldn't > be a > > good thing if people are trying to source control their latex > source > > files. > > > > Hi Peter, > > of course not. I currently happily use these settings and are also > using > svn and the latex package svn-multi. > The suffix list a list with file-suffixes which are considered not > worth > keeping. kile will never start to delete directories on the clean up. > > Thomas Hi Thomas, Sounds okay to me. Cheers, Peter Search 1000's of available singles in your area at the new Yahoo!7 Dating. Get Started http://au.dating.yahoo.com/?cid=53151&pid=1011 |
From: Peter A. <p_a...@ya...> - 2008-11-04 21:57:03
|
----- "Thomas Braun" <br...@ph...> wrote: > From: "Thomas Braun" <br...@ph...> > To: kil...@li... > Sent: Wednesday, 5 November, 2008 7:02:25 AM GMT +10:00 Brisbane > Subject: [Kile-devel] Changing the list of file suffixes to delete > > Hi there, > > in my opinion some file suffixes are missing in the "to clean list". > Does anyone use handcrafted bbl files? If we should not add .bbl as > suggested below. > > new: > .aux .bit .blg <.bbl> .lof .log .lot .glo <.glx .gxg .gxs> .idx .ilg .ind > <.out .url .svn> .toc Does this mean clean would wipe out .svn directories? That couldn't be a good thing if people are trying to source control their latex source files. > old: > .aux .bit .blg .lof .log .lot .glo .idx .ilg .ind .toc > > bbl: bibtex > glx, gxg, gxs: glosstex > out: hyperref > url: jurabib > svn: svn-multi > > > Thomas > Search 1000's of available singles in your area at the new Yahoo!7 Dating. Get Started http://au.dating.yahoo.com/?cid=53151&pid=1011 |
From: Thomas B. <br...@ph...> - 2008-11-04 22:01:34
|
Am Di, 4.11.2008, 22:30 schrieb Peter Ansell: > > ----- "Thomas Braun" <br...@ph...> wrote: > >> From: "Thomas Braun" <br...@ph...> >> To: kil...@li... >> Sent: Wednesday, 5 November, 2008 7:02:25 AM GMT +10:00 Brisbane >> Subject: [Kile-devel] Changing the list of file suffixes to delete >> >> Hi there, >> >> in my opinion some file suffixes are missing in the "to clean list". >> Does anyone use handcrafted bbl files? If we should not add .bbl as >> suggested below. >> >> new: >> .aux .bit .blg <.bbl> .lof .log .lot .glo <.glx .gxg .gxs> .idx .ilg >> .ind >> <.out .url .svn> .toc > > Does this mean clean would wipe out .svn directories? That couldn't be a > good thing if people are trying to source control their latex source > files. > Hi Peter, of course not. I currently happily use these settings and are also using svn and the latex package svn-multi. The suffix list a list with file-suffixes which are considered not worth keeping. kile will never start to delete directories on the clean up. Thomas |
From: Thomas B. <br...@ph...> - 2008-12-04 11:22:34
|
Hi, another extension I will add is ".tdo" from the todonotes package. If no one objects I will commit the changes in a few days to trunk. Thomas |