[Kerncomp-devel] Re: [ANNOUNCE] Automated Kernel Build Regression Testing
Brought to you by:
delsarto,
dswatgelato
From: Jan D. <jdi...@pp...> - 2005-05-14 16:44:23
|
Ian Wienand wrote: > On Wed, May 11, 2005 at 09:30:49PM +0200, Jan Dittmer wrote: > >>You know about ARMLinux Kautobuild? [1] That's also pretty far >>developed and does _lots_ of configs. Though arm is somewhat quicker >>to build than ia64. > > > Yep, that's another interesting one; they have some nice graphs but > I'm not sure how useful they are. Again an RSS feed or email would be > handy. I already send myself emails of changes between versions. rss is on my todo list, though I'd like to change the structure slightly first, as written in in the other mail. >>What are the goals any of this kerncomp project anyways? Just collecting >>resources or were you planning on developing _the_ kernel compile and >>runtime test application or just not really decided yet? > > > As a minimum I hoped we could keep interesting scripts together to > save someone else who wanted to set up an autobuild doing the whole > thing over again. > > I wonder if there is demand for one combined project or if everyone > has domain-specific issues they like to keep in their own project? > For example, we're very interested in making sure our various patches > apply to the absolute latest kernel. Fixing problems the next morning > is *much* better than waiting for the next -rc release since you'll > just end up with all your problems combined. For others this might > not be such an issue. That is coverted mostly by mm I think, as most breakages get discovered there first before they even remotly hit mainline. Though I don't know how many people test mm on ia64... >>Yes, I consider that, but I've to do at least a bit clean up before. >>Currently the code state is just too embarrassing. > > > Ahh, I know the feeling. The good thing about posting embarrassing > code is that it acts as a catalyst for someone else to do the work for > you :) As Alan Cox once said, nothing gets a problem fixed faster than > an obviously incorrect patch; people just can't resist showing you the > right way! Well, I can submit my current version if you really want. I just need to write a small README how to set things up. Jan |