From: Christian B. <ein...@do...> - 2002-11-16 20:08:59
|
Am Samstag, 16. November 2002 20:48 schrieben Sie: > On Saturday 16 November 2002 08:41 pm, Christian Berger wrote: > > Yes, I agree, but specifying the time in seconds would simplyfy > > programming a great deal. It'S far easier to parse a simple number > > than something like 12:21:12.32, isn't it? We just multiply it by the > > number of fps and get the framenumber (currently) or use a more > > sophisticated algorithm later. > > Oh, now I understand, you don't like the colons! No problem. SO either a > long int in milliseconds or a float in seconds. I'm fine with either. Then a "float" in seconds. > > Cheers, > Rolf > > *************************************************************** > Rolf Dubitzky > e-mail: Rolf.Dubitzky@Physik.TU-Dresden.de > s-mail see http://hep.phy.tu-dresden.de/~dubitzky/ > *************************************************************** > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This sf.net email is sponsored by: To learn the basics of securing > your web site with SSL, click here to get a FREE TRIAL of a Thawte > Server Certificate: http://www.gothawte.com/rd524.html > _______________________________________________ > Kdenlive-devel mailing list > Kde...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kdenlive-devel -- Warning! (this is no commercial ad) This e-mail probably will be read by secret services. Therefore please get pgp or gnupg and send me your public key so we e-mail encryptedly. http://www.gnupg.org/ |