Re: [Karrigell-main] client address patch.

[Pierre Q. <que...@wa...>]

All you have to do is ask : I've added the REQUEST_HANDLER variable in the
latest version on CVS

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Gabriele Giorgetti" <gab...@te...>
To: <kar...@li...>
Sent: Thursday, October 02, 2003 9:05 AM
Subject: Re: [Karrigell-main] client address patch.


> Pierre Quentel wrote:
>
> >To be more generic, perhaps it would be even more useful to introduce a
> >variable REQUEST_HANDLER which is the current instance of
> >karrigellRequestHandler. Then you can find the IP address by :
> >
> >REQUEST_HANDLER.client_address[0]
> >
> >and if you need the client port :
> >REQUEST_HANDLER.client_address[1]
> >
> >You can take advantage of all the attributes of this instance (server,
> >connection, etc). I think it's better not to add too many names in the
> >user's namespace
> >
> >Would this be ok for what you need ? What do the others think ?
> >Cheers,
> >
> >Pierre
> >
> Yes I agree with you, it's not good to add too many junk in the user's
> namespace. By the way  as  I already told you my patch is just a temp.
> workaround to get the client's ip address, quick
>
> Please go ahead with the REQUEST_HANDLER thing if you think it's
> usefull as well.
>
> Cheers.
>
>
>
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
> Welcome to geek heaven.
> http://thinkgeek.com/sf
> _______________________________________________
> Karrigell-main mailing list
> Kar...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/karrigell-main