Re: [Kaldi-users] LM weight

[Kirill K. <kir...@sm...>]

I am getting the same ratio on both small and more targeted, and a quite large general LM. I do not understand what to make out if it!

 -kkm

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Nagendra Goel [mailto:nag...@go...]
> Sent: 2015-06-22 2032
> To: Kirill Katsnelson; kal...@li...
> Subject: RE: [Kaldi-users] LM weight
> 
> Or maybe your domain is limited and LM very nicely matched to the task
> at hand?
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Kirill Katsnelson [mailto:kir...@sm...]
> Sent: Monday, June 22, 2015 11:29 PM
> To: kal...@li...
> Subject: [Kaldi-users] LM weight
> 
> I my test sets I am getting the best WER at LM/acoustic weight in the
> range of 18-19, with multiple LMs of different size and origin. I was
> usually thinking the usual ballpark figure about 10, give or take. From
> your experience, does this larger LM weight mean anything, and what if
> it does? I am guessing an inadequate acoustic model, requiring more LM
> "pull"--am I making sense?
> 
>  -kkm
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
> -----
> --
> Monitor 25 network devices or servers for free with OpManager!
> OpManager is web-based network management software that monitors
> network devices and physical & virtual servers, alerts via email & sms
> for fault.
> Monitor 25 devices for free with no restriction. Download now
> http://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/292181274;119417398;o
> _______________________________________________
> Kaldi-users mailing list
> Kal...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kaldi-users