Re: [Kaldi-developers] Problems Running Kaldi Tests

SourceForge Headquarters 1320 Columbia Street Suite 310 San Diego, CA 92101 +1 (858) 422-6466

Alright, I'll continue with the tutorial for now. Thanks again

On Wed, Dec 3, 2014 at 1:13 AM, Daniel Povey <dp...@gm...> wrote:

> According to
> http://stackoverflow.com/questions/19554439/gdb-missing-in-os-x-mavericks
> gdb is no longer supported in mavericks and you have to use lldb. I've
> never used that so I don't know what to tell you to do.
> Dogan, do you have a mavericks setup, and can you see if you get the
> infinite loop that he gets when you test?
> Joaqin: I would just continue through the tutorial for now.  Probably
> it's not going to be a problem.
> Dan
>
>
> On Wed, Dec 3, 2014 at 1:09 AM, Daniel Povey <dp...@gm...> wrote:
> > Hm.  That makes me think there may be a problem with your gcc/gdb
> > installation- maybe you could try uninstalling it and installing it
> > again.  Did you get it from MacPorts?
> > Dan
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Dec 3, 2014 at 1:05 AM, Joaquin Antonio Ruales
> > <ja...@co...> wrote:
> >> Now I get:
> >>
> >>
> >> Program received signal SIGINT, Interrupt.
> >>
> >> 0x00007fff8c755e9a in ?? ()
> >>
> >> (gdb) b matrix-lib-test.cc:39
> >>
> >> Cannot access memory at address 0xab670
> >>
> >>
> >> On Wed, Dec 3, 2014 at 12:57 AM, Daniel Povey <dp...@gm...> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Probably when you did ctrl-c it was in the Atlas library, sometimes it
> >>> can't get a proper backtrace.  Instead, after doing ctrl-c do:
> >>>  (gdb) b matrix-lib-test.cc:39
> >>>  (gdb) c
> >>>
> >>> to continue, and when it breaks, show me a backtrace.
> >>> Dan
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Wed, Dec 3, 2014 at 12:48 AM, Joaquin Antonio Ruales
> >>> <ja...@co...> wrote:
> >>> > This is what I get:
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>> > Program received signal SIGINT, Interrupt.
> >>> >
> >>> > 0x00007fff8b2c6342 in ?? ()
> >>> >
> >>> > (gdb) bt
> >>> >
> >>> > #0  0x00007fff8b2c6342 in ?? ()
> >>> >
> >>> > #1  0x00007fff5fbfdbc8 in ?? ()
> >>> >
> >>> > #2  0x0000000000000001 in ?? ()
> >>> >
> >>> > #3  0x00007fff5fbfdfdc in ?? ()
> >>> >
> >>> > #4  0x00007fff5fbfdfe0 in ?? ()
> >>> >
> >>> > #5  0x00007fff5fbfdbbe in ?? ()
> >>> >
> >>> > #6  0x0000000100102672 in ?? ()
> >>> >
> >>> > #7  0x00007fff5fbfdc10 in ?? ()
> >>> >
> >>> > #8  0x00007fff8b00eac4 in ?? ()
> >>> >
> >>> > #9  0x00007fff5fbfda90 in ?? ()
> >>> >
> >>> > #10 0x00007fff8e2bf272 in ?? ()
> >>> >
> >>> > #11 0x00000002001a0a00 in ?? ()
> >>> >
> >>> > #12 0x00000001001a0a00 in ?? ()
> >>> >
> >>> > #13 0x000000010019d000 in ?? ()
> >>> >
> >>> > #14 0x00000001001a0a00 in ?? ()
> >>> >
> >>> > #15 0x00000001003002ca in ?? ()
> >>> >
> >>> > #16 0x0000000000000000 in ?? ()
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>> > On Wed, Dec 3, 2014 at 12:42 AM, Daniel Povey <dp...@gm...>
> wrote:
> >>> >>
> >>> >> That isn't normal and it doesn't happen when I compile on a Mac.
> >>> >> Can you run it in gdb by doing
> >>> >> gdb ./matrix-lib-test
> >>> >> (gdb) r
> >>> >>
> >>> >> and then do ctrl-c when it gets in the loop and type "bt" and show
> me
> >>> >> the backtrace?
> >>> >> Dan
> >>> >>
> >>> >>
> >>> >> On Wed, Dec 3, 2014 at 12:36 AM, Joaquin Antonio Ruales
> >>> >> <ja...@co...> wrote:
> >>> >> > Hi Dan,
> >>> >> >
> >>> >> > Thanks for the quick reply. I have "svn up"ed and recompiled
> >>> >> > everything,
> >>> >> > but
> >>> >> > now the same matrix test runs into an infinite loop. Would it be
> safe
> >>> >> > to
> >>> >> > ignore the test results and continue with the tutorial? Here are
> the
> >>> >> > few
> >>> >> > lines of output from the test:
> >>> >> >
> >>> >> > LOG (RandPosdefSpMatrix():matrix-lib-test.cc:39) Condition number
> of
> >>> >> > random
> >>> >> > matrix large 7.50727e+16, trying again (this is normal)
> >>> >> >
> >>> >> > LOG (RandPosdefSpMatrix():matrix-lib-test.cc:39) Condition number
> of
> >>> >> > random
> >>> >> > matrix large 1.91265e+16, trying again (this is normal)
> >>> >> >
> >>> >> > LOG (RandPosdefSpMatrix():matrix-lib-test.cc:39) Condition number
> of
> >>> >> > random
> >>> >> > matrix large 7.70738e+16, trying again (this is normal)
> >>> >> >
> >>> >> > LOG (RandPosdefSpMatrix():matrix-lib-test.cc:39) Condition number
> of
> >>> >> > random
> >>> >> > matrix large 2.32488e+17, trying again (this is normal)
> >>> >> >
> >>> >> > LOG (RandPosdefSpMatrix():matrix-lib-test.cc:39) Condition number
> of
> >>> >> > random
> >>> >> > matrix large 8.44565e+17, trying again (this is normal)
> >>> >> >
> >>> >> > LOG (RandPosdefSpMatrix():matrix-lib-test.cc:39) Condition number
> of
> >>> >> > random
> >>> >> > matrix large 1.83557e+17, trying again (this is normal)
> >>> >> >
> >>> >> > LOG (RandPosdefSpMatrix():matrix-lib-test.cc:39) Condition number
> of
> >>> >> > random
> >>> >> > matrix large 2.61736e+17, trying again (this is normal)
> >>> >> >
> >>> >> > LOG (RandPosdefSpMatrix():matrix-lib-test.cc:39) Condition number
> of
> >>> >> > random
> >>> >> > matrix large 8.67803e+16, trying again (this is normal)
> >>> >> >
> >>> >> > LOG (RandPosdefSpMatrix():matrix-lib-test.cc:39) Condition number
> of
> >>> >> > random
> >>> >> > matrix large 1.80053e+16, trying again (this is normal)
> >>> >> >
> >>> >> > LOG (RandPosdefSpMatrix():matrix-lib-test.cc:39) Condition number
> of
> >>> >> > random
> >>> >> > matrix large 1.67101e+16, trying again (this is normal)
> >>> >> >
> >>> >> > LOG (RandPosdefSpMatrix():matrix-lib-test.cc:39) Condition number
> of
> >>> >> > random
> >>> >> > matrix large 1.49485e+16, trying again (this is normal)
> >>> >> >
> >>> >> > LOG (RandPosdefSpMatrix():matrix-lib-test.cc:39) Condition number
> of
> >>> >> > random
> >>> >> > matrix large 8.31813e+16, trying again (this is normal)
> >>> >> >
> >>> >> > LOG (RandPosdefSpMatrix():matrix-lib-test.cc:39) Condition number
> of
> >>> >> > random
> >>> >> > matrix large 1.6285e+16, trying again (this is normal)
> >>> >> >
> >>> >> > LOG (RandPosdefSpMatrix():matrix-lib-test.cc:39) Condition number
> of
> >>> >> > random
> >>> >> > matrix large 2.48172e+16, trying again (this is normal)
> >>> >> >
> >>> >> > LOG (RandPosdefSpMatrix():matrix-lib-test.cc:39) Condition number
> of
> >>> >> > random
> >>> >> > matrix large 2.1569e+16, trying again (this is normal)
> >>> >> >
> >>> >> >
> >>> >> > On Tue, Dec 2, 2014 at 4:35 PM, Daniel Povey <dp...@gm...>
> >>> >> > wrote:
> >>> >> >>
> >>> >> >> I think I had noticed this before, and I fixed the test by
> changing
> >>> >> >> the threshold.
> >>> >> >> If you do "svn up" and recompile, it should pass.
> >>> >> >> Dan
> >>> >> >>
> >>> >> >>
> >>> >> >> On Tue, Dec 2, 2014 at 4:20 PM, Joaquín Ruales
> >>> >> >> <ja...@co...>
> >>> >> >> wrote:
> >>> >> >> > Hi Kaldi Team,
> >>> >> >> >
> >>> >> >> > I'm running into trouble when running the Kaldi tests (make
> test)
> >>> >> >> > described
> >>> >> >> > in the Kaldi tutorial. I'm running it on a Mac (Mavericks) and
> the
> >>> >> >> > error
> >>> >> >> > is
> >>> >> >> > in matrix-lib-test: KALDI_ASSERT: at
> >>> >> >> > UnitTestLinearCgd:matrix-lib-test.cc:3118, failed: error <
> 1.0e-05
> >>> >> >> > *
> >>> >> >> > b.Norm(2.0)
> >>> >> >> >
> >>> >> >> > Has anyone faced this problem before or have any suggestions?
> >>> >> >> >
> >>> >> >> > Thanks,
> >>> >> >> > Joaquín
> >>> >> >> >
> >>> >> >> >
> >>> >> >> >
> >>> >> >> >
> >>> >> >> >
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>> >> >> > Download BIRT iHub F-Type - The Free Enterprise-Grade BIRT
> Server
> >>> >> >> > from Actuate! Instantly Supercharge Your Business Reports and
> >>> >> >> > Dashboards
> >>> >> >> > with Interactivity, Sharing, Native Excel Exports, App
> Integration
> >>> >> >> > &
> >>> >> >> > more
> >>> >> >> > Get technology previously reserved for billion-dollar
> >>> >> >> > corporations,
> >>> >> >> > FREE
> >>> >> >> >
> >>> >> >> >
> >>> >> >> >
> >>> >> >> >
> http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=164703151&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
> >>> >> >> > _______________________________________________
> >>> >> >> > Kaldi-developers mailing list
> >>> >> >> > Kal...@li...
> >>> >> >> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kaldi-developers
> >>> >> >> >
> >>> >> >
> >>> >> >
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>
> >>
>