|
From: Mailing l. u. f. U. C. a. U. <kal...@li...> - 2013-10-02 20:59:25
|
Thank you for your help. I suspect that all these peculiarities arise from a NIST competition or something like that? Would Kaldi results be comparable with published results if I use s4 standard scripts for training and have 192 sentences TIMIT core as a test set? Valentin On Thu, Oct 3, 2013 at 12:23 AM, Mailing list used for User Communication and Updates <kal...@li...> wrote: > On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 9:00 PM, Mailing list used for User > Communication and Updates <kal...@li...> wrote: >> Where can I find a description of how the classical train/test splits >> should look like? >> If I find that out I will be glad to mend the recipe. >> Maybe one of s3 or s4 is better? > > Look a s4. TIMIT has various peculiarities. Not just how the > train/dev/test sets are defined, but it's also a common practise to > train on one set of phones and score on a subset of those. And silence > is scored, which is really a free giveaway. -Arnab > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > October Webinars: Code for Performance > Free Intel webinars can help you accelerate application performance. > Explore tips for MPI, OpenMP, advanced profiling, and more. Get the most from > the latest Intel processors and coprocessors. See abstracts and register > > http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=60134791&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk > _______________________________________________ > Kaldi-users mailing list > Kal...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kaldi-users |