|
From: Mailing l. u. f. U. C. a. U. <kal...@li...> - 2013-10-02 19:17:38
|
The people who run TIMIT experiments are quite often people who don't have much knowledge about speech recognition techniques and they want to run some experiments anyway. I advise to avoid TIMIT. BTW, there is a paper from IBM (with Tara Sainath?) that applies state-of-the-art methods to TIMIT, that may be a more relevant baseline. Dan On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 3:13 PM, Mailing list used for User Communication and Updates <kal...@li...> wrote: > Hi, > > I’m a bit stuck with Kaldi TIMIT recipe. > In many articles there are phoneme error rate results which are much > worse than what one can obtain by simply running s5/run.sh on TIMIT > core. Apparently the recipe employs triphones with tied states when > papers present error numbers obtained on monophones (even Hinton’s RBM > paper is about a neural net with 183 outputs). > > How can I make a proper baseline on TIMIT core for a paper with Kaldi? > Why people don’t use triphones on TIMIT cause they are much better? > > Valentin > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > October Webinars: Code for Performance > Free Intel webinars can help you accelerate application performance. > Explore tips for MPI, OpenMP, advanced profiling, and more. Get the most from > the latest Intel processors and coprocessors. See abstracts and register > > http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=60134791&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk > _______________________________________________ > Kaldi-users mailing list > Kal...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kaldi-users |