|
From: Mailing l. u. f. U. C. a. U. <kal...@li...> - 2013-06-27 14:13:40
|
Thanks for letting us know. (Paul Dixon, I imagine?) Dan On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 7:44 AM, Mailing list used for User Communication and Updates <kal...@li...> wrote: > Hi Giles, > > This is great, I just tried the new version and it is much faster. > I compared arpa2fst to ngramread from opengrm and arpa2fst is nearly two > times faster. > (Both were compiled with -O2 -g flags) > > Thanks > > Paul > > > > On 19 June 2013 06:00, Mailing list used for User Communication and Updates > <kal...@li...> wrote: >> >> I just committed an improved version of arpa2fst. >> It is twice as fast, and memory use has been reduced by 20% to 50%. >> >> So now for a typical 4-gram LM: >> >> on-disk arpa file: 3.8 GB >> arpa2fst memory usage: 20 GB >> in-memory size of G fst alone: 8.9 GB >> on disk size of G fst: 3.7 GB >> >> - Gilles >> >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows: >> >> Build for Windows Store. >> >> http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev >> _______________________________________________ >> Kaldi-users mailing list >> Kal...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kaldi-users > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows: > > Build for Windows Store. > > http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev > _______________________________________________ > Kaldi-users mailing list > Kal...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kaldi-users > |