Re: [Kaldi-users] reproducing numbers in wsj/s5

SourceForge Headquarters 1320 Columbia Street Suite 310 San Diego, CA 92101 +1 (858) 422-6466

Thanks [arnab, I assume].
I just found the problem myself also.
Sorry.

Dan

On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 1:08 PM, Mailing list used for User Communication
and Updates <kal...@li...> wrote:

> Found the problem! It's in local/score.sh -- in rev 2443 you added an
> option for using word insertion penalty before which the lattice
> acoustic scores get scaled by lm weight. But the lattice-best-path is
> also using a scaling, and so the scores are being scaled twice. The
> fix is in the repository. But I haven't checked if the word insertion
> penalty has been added to other scoring scripts as well.
>
> Hao, please rerun and you should get something around 34.76% for dev93.
>
> On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 5:48 PM, Mailing list used for User
> Communication and Updates <kal...@li...> wrote:
> > BTW, I suspect local/make_lexicon_fst.pl
> > I made a change which I thought was a simple bug fix that would not
> affect
> > anything.
> > Dan
> >
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 12:33 PM, Mailing list used for User Communication
> > and Updates <kal...@li...> wrote:
> >>
> >> There seems to be something broken with the current WSJ setup. I reran
> >> the setup today and I am getting similar results as Hao. For example,
> >> an older setup gets 34.98% on dev93, while the system trained today
> >> gets 47.79%. The problem is not features, since the older model with
> >> the new features is 34.76%. The problem is also not the dict/lm since
> >> the old model with new dict/lm and old features gets 34.98%. It is
> >> unlikely to be the new model, since the log-likelihood numbers are in
> >> the same ballpark. My current best guess is that some setting in the
> >> decode/scoring scripts has changed, which is causing the problem. I am
> >> looking into this in more detail.
> >> -Arnab
> >>
> >> On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 8:02 AM, Mailing list used for User
> >> Communication and Updates <kal...@li...> wrote:
> >> > Here are the log for the last update with different number of jobs. I
> >> > don't see much of a difference.
> >> >
> >> > In terms of likelihood shown below, they are pretty consistent.
> >> >
> >> > nj=2 -109.265 -> -95.5657
> >> > nj=4 -109.265 -> -95.5599
> >> > nj=8 -109.265 -> -95.556
> >> >
> >> > Hao
> >> >
> >> > On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 5:29 PM, Mailing list used for User
> >> > Communication and Updates <kal...@li...> wrote:
> >> >> OK, I have an idea what might have happened.  It's possible that
> >> >> because you
> >> >> are using such a small number of parallel jobs (2), there is a
> problem
> >> >> due
> >> >> to numerical roundoff.  This should not be the case because we
> >> >> accumulate in
> >> >> double, but to see whether this is a factor, could you please run the
> >> >> training with more jobs?  E.g. 4 or 8? See if the likelihoods change.
> >> >> Also,
> >> >> show me the full log from the last update, both before and after you
> >> >> make
> >> >> the change.
> >> >> Dan
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 6:23 PM, Mailing list used for User
> >> >> Communication and
> >> >> Updates <kal...@li...> wrote:
> >> >>>
> >> >>> They are almost identical.
> >> >>>
> >> >>> 011c0201  [
> >> >>>   46.88603 -32.66241 -11.9018 -14.99819 -4.834829 -2.596024 -5.20842
> >> >>> 2.553219 3.935668 10.76861 9.013732 4.780495 -3.26797
> >> >>>   46.34384 -33.52037 -10.28797 -11.47937 -5.18444 -6.867837
> -12.17628
> >> >>> -6.932252 -7.423642 -1.106863 3.337547 -0.5728683 0.6971088
> >> >>>   46.81014 -31.05773 -7.440363 -11.46406 -5.926405 -2.568082
> -3.351704
> >> >>> -5.60004 -8.281031 -9.46069 6.799883 6.513657 -7.97058
> >> >>>   46.8651 -30.11357 -5.052508 -11.06986 -6.155907 -2.664125 -10.907
> >> >>> -8.487434 -3.194182 -6.367419 6.390572 0.01187897 -0.1876552
> >> >>>   46.92208 -33.49314 -9.207784 -12.05287 -5.494797 -4.269251
> -9.91317
> >> >>> -1.722169 -0.7680084 -2.61649 9.212611 7.324253 12.41928
> >> >>>   46.8317 -32.19164 -8.810924 -12.31202 -3.736232 -1.335111
> -8.361964
> >> >>> -2.103669 -3.199154 -6.140819 -8.036694 -8.49004 2.942402
> >> >>>   47.34614 -33.04692 -7.571927 -8.986547 -3.523783 1.130056
> -3.151051
> >> >>> 3.572649 3.381185 -3.117306 -2.670765 2.165989 0.3512498
> >> >>>   46.63126 -33.57331 -11.13035 -7.506401 2.113542 3.268812 -1.814186
> >> >>> 2.770102 -4.381135 -3.264607 -3.549407 2.463478 -0.7675163
> >> >>>   46.31366 -33.00954 -6.964884 -6.109343 -7.121595 -4.326707
> -10.80855
> >> >>> -6.96949 6.597637 4.109591 1.001096 2.592361 6.154362
> >> >>>
> >> >>> Hao
> >> >>>
> >> >>> On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 5:11 PM, Mailing list used for User
> >> >>> Communication and Updates <kal...@li...>
> wrote:
> >> >>> > OK, everything there looks pretty normal.  Let's check the
> features.
> >> >>> > Try
> >> >>> > doing
> >> >>> >
> >> >>> >  path.sh; copy-feats scp:data/train_si284/feats.scp ark,t:- | head
> >> >>> > copy-feats scp:data/train_si284/feats.scp ark,t:-
> >> >>> > 011c0201  [
> >> >>> >   46.88603 -32.66241 -11.9018 -14.99819 -4.834829 -2.596024
> -5.20842
> >> >>> > 2.553219 3.935668 10.76861 9.013732 4.780495 -3.267961
> >> >>> >   46.34384 -33.52037 -10.28797 -11.47937 -5.184441 -6.867837
> >> >>> > -12.17628
> >> >>> > -6.93225 -7.423645 -1.106866 3.337547 -0.5728683 0.6970833
> >> >>> >   46.81014 -31.05773 -7.440367 -11.46406 -5.926404 -2.568073
> >> >>> > -3.351702
> >> >>> > -5.60004 -8.281028 -9.460709 6.799894 6.513657 -7.970572
> >> >>> >   46.8651 -30.11357 -5.052508 -11.06986 -6.155907 -2.664125
> -10.907
> >> >>> > -8.487434 -3.194182 -6.367419 6.390572 0.01187897 -0.1876552
> >> >>> >   46.92208 -33.49314 -9.207782 -12.05287 -5.4948 -4.269254
> -9.913167
> >> >>> > -1.722165 -0.7680123 -2.616493 9.212611 7.324253 12.41928
> >> >>> >   46.8317 -32.19164 -8.810924 -12.31202 -3.736232 -1.335111
> >> >>> > -8.361964
> >> >>> > -2.103669 -3.199154 -6.140819 -8.036694 -8.49004 2.942402
> >> >>> >   47.34614 -33.04692 -7.571927 -8.986545 -3.523783 1.130052
> >> >>> > -3.151051
> >> >>> > 3.572651 3.381188 -3.117314 -2.670754 2.165966 0.3512328
> >> >>> >   46.63126 -33.57331 -11.13035 -7.506401 2.113541 3.268804
> -1.814186
> >> >>> > 2.770107 -4.381127 -3.264618 -3.549418 2.463501 -0.7675107
> >> >>> >   46.31366 -33.00954 -6.964884 -6.109342 -7.121596 -4.326709
> >> >>> > -10.80855
> >> >>> > -6.96948 6.597637 4.109591 1.001096 2.592361 6.154356
> >> >>> >
> >> >>> > and show me the otuput
> >> >>> > Dan
> >> >>> >
> >> >>> >
> >> >>> >
> >> >>> > On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 5:59 PM, Mailing list used for User
> >> >>> > Communication
> >> >>> > and
> >> >>> > Updates <kal...@li...> wrote:
> >> >>> >>
> >> >>> >> Here is the result for
> >> >>> >>
> >> >>> >>     ls -l data/lang  data/lang/phones exp/mono0a exp/mono0a/log
> >> >>> >> exp/mono0a/decode/log
> >> >>> >>
> >> >>> >> Hao
> >> >>> >>
> >> >>> >> On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 4:49 PM, Mailing list used for User
> >> >>> >> Communication and Updates <kal...@li...>
> >> >>> >> wrote:
> >> >>> >> > My corresponding numbers are -108.535 ->  -95.116, and the
> >> >>> >> > difference
> >> >>> >> > is
> >> >>> >> > about the same.  [It's strange that the absolute numbers differ
> >> >>> >> > slightly,
> >> >>> >> > though.]
> >> >>> >> > Could you do
> >> >>> >> > ls -l data/lang  data/lang/phones exp/mono0a exp/mono0a/log
> >> >>> >> > exp/mono0a/decode/log
> >> >>> >> > and send the output?
> >> >>> >> >
> >> >>> >> > Dan
> >> >>> >> >
> >> >>> >> >
> >> >>> >> >
> >> >>> >> > On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 5:42 PM, Mailing list used for User
> >> >>> >> > Communication
> >> >>> >> > and
> >> >>> >> > Updates <kal...@li...> wrote:
> >> >>> >> >>
> >> >>> >> >> Copied from exp/mono0a/log/update.39.log
> >> >>> >> >>
> >> >>> >> >>     LOG (gmm-sum-accs:main():gmm-sum-accs.cc:60) Summed 2
> stats,
> >> >>> >> >> total
> >> >>> >> >> count 849568, avg like/frame -95.5657
> >> >>> >> >>
> >> >>> >> >> Hao
> >> >>> >> >>
> >> >>> >> >> On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 4:29 PM, Mailing list used for User
> >> >>> >> >> Communication and Updates <kal...@li...>
> >> >>> >> >> wrote:
> >> >>> >> >> > OK, that is quite weird.  What is the avg like/frame on the
> >> >>> >> >> > final
> >> >>> >> >> > update.??.log?
> >> >>> >> >> > Dan
> >> >>> >> >> >
> >> >>> >> >> >
> >> >>> >> >> >
> >> >>> >> >> > On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 5:00 PM, Mailing list used for User
> >> >>> >> >> > Communication
> >> >>> >> >> > and
> >> >>> >> >> > Updates <kal...@li...> wrote:
> >> >>> >> >> >>
> >> >>> >> >> >> Unfortunately those are absolute differences. Here is what
> I
> >> >>> >> >> >> get
> >> >>> >> >> >> for
> >> >>> >> >> >> the
> >> >>> >> >> >> mono0a.
> >> >>> >> >> >>
> >> >>> >> >> >>     %WER 40.44 [ 2282 / 5643, 118 ins, 537 del, 1627 sub ]
> >> >>> >> >> >> exp/mono0a/decode_tgpr_eval92/wer_9
> >> >>> >> >> >>
> >> >>> >> >> >> And below is the reported one in RESULTS.
> >> >>> >> >> >>
> >> >>> >> >> >>     exp/mono0a/decode_tgpr_eval92/wer_10:%WER 25.54 [ 1441
> /
> >> >>> >> >> >> 5643,
> >> >>> >> >> >> 149
> >> >>> >> >> >> ins, 191 del, 1101 sub ]
> >> >>> >> >> >>
> >> >>> >> >> >> I will try to checkout the same version as the RESULTS file
> >> >>> >> >> >> and
> >> >>> >> >> >> run
> >> >>> >> >> >> the experiments again.
> >> >>> >> >> >>
> >> >>> >> >> >> Here is the total data count from
> >> >>> >> >> >> exp/mono0a/log/update.0.log.
> >> >>> >> >> >>
> >> >>> >> >> >>     LOG (gmm-sum-accs:main():gmm-sum-accs.cc:60) Summed 2
> >> >>> >> >> >> stats,
> >> >>> >> >> >> total
> >> >>> >> >> >> count 849568, avg like/frame -109.265
> >> >>> >> >> >>
> >> >>> >> >> >> Thanks for your help.
> >> >>> >> >> >>
> >> >>> >> >> >> Hao
> >> >>> >> >> >>
> >> >>> >> >> >> On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 3:43 PM, Mailing list used for User
> >> >>> >> >> >> Communication and Updates <
> kal...@li...>
> >> >>> >> >> >> wrote:
> >> >>> >> >> >> > Assuming those are relative numbers, they're probably
> >> >>> >> >> >> > within
> >> >>> >> >> >> > the
> >> >>> >> >> >> > margin
> >> >>> >> >> >> > of
> >> >>> >> >> >> > error.  See if it's the same on other test sets.  Because
> >> >>> >> >> >> > various
> >> >>> >> >> >> > algorithms
> >> >>> >> >> >> > call rand(), and different machines implement this
> >> >>> >> >> >> > differently,
> >> >>> >> >> >> > results
> >> >>> >> >> >> > aren't fully reproducible.
> >> >>> >> >> >> >
> >> >>> >> >> >> > But to check that it's not some code change that hurts
> the
> >> >>> >> >> >> > results,
> >> >>> >> >> >> > you
> >> >>> >> >> >> > could try checking out a copy with the same revision
> number
> >> >>> >> >> >> > as
> >> >>> >> >> >> > the
> >> >>> >> >> >> > RESULTS
> >> >>> >> >> >> > file, and running again and seeing what results you get.
> >> >>> >> >> >> > If
> >> >>> >> >> >> > there
> >> >>> >> >> >> > is
> >> >>> >> >> >> > a
> >> >>> >> >> >> > difference, I'd like to know.
> >> >>> >> >> >> >
> >> >>> >> >> >> > It's also possible some files were missing in your WSJ
> >> >>> >> >> >> > distribution--
> >> >>> >> >> >> > let me
> >> >>> >> >> >> > know the data count reported in one the */log/update.log
> >> >>> >> >> >> > files
> >> >>> >> >> >> > and
> >> >>> >> >> >> > I'll
> >> >>> >> >> >> > compare with a local copy.
> >> >>> >> >> >> >
> >> >>> >> >> >> > Dan
> >> >>> >> >> >> >
> >> >>> >> >> >> >
> >> >>> >> >> >> >
> >> >>> >> >> >> > On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 4:34 PM, Mailing list used for
> User
> >> >>> >> >> >> > Communication
> >> >>> >> >> >> > and
> >> >>> >> >> >> > Updates <kal...@li...> wrote:
> >> >>> >> >> >> >>
> >> >>> >> >> >> >> Hi,
> >> >>> >> >> >> >>
> >> >>> >> >> >> >> I'm following the WSJ s5 recipe, and I wasn't able to
> >> >>> >> >> >> >> reproduce
> >> >>> >> >> >> >> the
> >> >>> >> >> >> >> results stated in the RESULTS file. Are we supposed to
> get
> >> >>> >> >> >> >> exactly
> >> >>> >> >> >> >> the
> >> >>> >> >> >> >> same numbers with the (hyper-)parameters given in the
> >> >>> >> >> >> >> recipe?
> >> >>> >> >> >> >>
> >> >>> >> >> >> >> Just to give a sense of how far I'm off. My monophone
> >> >>> >> >> >> >> models
> >> >>> >> >> >> >> perform
> >> >>> >> >> >> >> 10%
> >> >>> >> >> >> >> worse than the reported results on eval92 and the
> >> >>> >> >> >> >> resulting
> >> >>> >> >> >> >> triphone
> >> >>> >> >> >> >> models perform 4% worse.
> >> >>> >> >> >> >>
> >> >>> >> >> >> >> Thanks,
> >> >>> >> >> >> >> Hao
> >> >>> >> >> >> >>
> >> >>> >> >> >> >>
> >> >>> >> >> >> >>
> >> >>> >> >> >> >>
> >> >>> >> >> >> >>
> >> >>> >> >> >> >>
> >> >>> >> >> >> >>
> >> >>> >> >> >> >>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> >>> >> >> >> >> How ServiceNow helps IT people transform IT departments:
> >> >>> >> >> >> >> 1. A cloud service to automate IT design, transition and
> >> >>> >> >> >> >> operations
> >> >>> >> >> >> >> 2. Dashboards that offer high-level views of enterprise
> >> >>> >> >> >> >> services
> >> >>> >> >> >> >> 3. A single system of record for all IT processes
> >> >>> >> >> >> >> http://p.sf.net/sfu/servicenow-d2d-j
> >> >>> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________
> >> >>> >> >> >> >> Kaldi-users mailing list
> >> >>> >> >> >> >> Kal...@li...
> >> >>> >> >> >> >>
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kaldi-users
> >> >>> >> >> >> >
> >> >>> >> >> >> >
> >> >>> >> >> >> >
> >> >>> >> >> >> >
> >> >>> >> >> >> >
> >> >>> >> >> >> >
> >> >>> >> >> >> >
> >> >>> >> >> >> >
> >> >>> >> >> >> >
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> >>> >> >> >> > How ServiceNow helps IT people transform IT departments:
> >> >>> >> >> >> > 1. A cloud service to automate IT design, transition and
> >> >>> >> >> >> > operations
> >> >>> >> >> >> > 2. Dashboards that offer high-level views of enterprise
> >> >>> >> >> >> > services
> >> >>> >> >> >> > 3. A single system of record for all IT processes
> >> >>> >> >> >> > http://p.sf.net/sfu/servicenow-d2d-j
> >> >>> >> >> >> > _______________________________________________
> >> >>> >> >> >> > Kaldi-users mailing list
> >> >>> >> >> >> > Kal...@li...
> >> >>> >> >> >> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kaldi-users
> >> >>> >> >> >> >
> >> >>> >> >> >>
> >> >>> >> >> >>
> >> >>> >> >> >>
> >> >>> >> >> >>
> >> >>> >> >> >>
> >> >>> >> >> >>
> >> >>> >> >> >>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> >>> >> >> >> How ServiceNow helps IT people transform IT departments:
> >> >>> >> >> >> 1. A cloud service to automate IT design, transition and
> >> >>> >> >> >> operations
> >> >>> >> >> >> 2. Dashboards that offer high-level views of enterprise
> >> >>> >> >> >> services
> >> >>> >> >> >> 3. A single system of record for all IT processes
> >> >>> >> >> >> http://p.sf.net/sfu/servicenow-d2d-j
> >> >>> >> >> >> _______________________________________________
> >> >>> >> >> >> Kaldi-users mailing list
> >> >>> >> >> >> Kal...@li...
> >> >>> >> >> >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kaldi-users
> >> >>> >> >> >
> >> >>> >> >> >
> >> >>> >> >> >
> >> >>> >> >> >
> >> >>> >> >> >
> >> >>> >> >> >
> >> >>> >> >> >
> >> >>> >> >> >
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> >>> >> >> > How ServiceNow helps IT people transform IT departments:
> >> >>> >> >> > 1. A cloud service to automate IT design, transition and
> >> >>> >> >> > operations
> >> >>> >> >> > 2. Dashboards that offer high-level views of enterprise
> >> >>> >> >> > services
> >> >>> >> >> > 3. A single system of record for all IT processes
> >> >>> >> >> > http://p.sf.net/sfu/servicenow-d2d-j
> >> >>> >> >> > _______________________________________________
> >> >>> >> >> > Kaldi-users mailing list
> >> >>> >> >> > Kal...@li...
> >> >>> >> >> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kaldi-users
> >> >>> >> >> >
> >> >>> >> >>
> >> >>> >> >>
> >> >>> >> >>
> >> >>> >> >>
> >> >>> >> >>
> >> >>> >> >>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> >>> >> >> How ServiceNow helps IT people transform IT departments:
> >> >>> >> >> 1. A cloud service to automate IT design, transition and
> >> >>> >> >> operations
> >> >>> >> >> 2. Dashboards that offer high-level views of enterprise
> services
> >> >>> >> >> 3. A single system of record for all IT processes
> >> >>> >> >> http://p.sf.net/sfu/servicenow-d2d-j
> >> >>> >> >> _______________________________________________
> >> >>> >> >> Kaldi-users mailing list
> >> >>> >> >> Kal...@li...
> >> >>> >> >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kaldi-users
> >> >>> >> >
> >> >>> >> >
> >> >>> >> >
> >> >>> >> >
> >> >>> >> >
> >> >>> >> >
> >> >>> >> >
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> >>> >> > How ServiceNow helps IT people transform IT departments:
> >> >>> >> > 1. A cloud service to automate IT design, transition and
> >> >>> >> > operations
> >> >>> >> > 2. Dashboards that offer high-level views of enterprise
> services
> >> >>> >> > 3. A single system of record for all IT processes
> >> >>> >> > http://p.sf.net/sfu/servicenow-d2d-j
> >> >>> >> > _______________________________________________
> >> >>> >> > Kaldi-users mailing list
> >> >>> >> > Kal...@li...
> >> >>> >> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kaldi-users
> >> >>> >> >
> >> >>> >>
> >> >>> >>
> >> >>> >>
> >> >>> >>
> >> >>> >>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> >>> >> How ServiceNow helps IT people transform IT departments:
> >> >>> >> 1. A cloud service to automate IT design, transition and
> operations
> >> >>> >> 2. Dashboards that offer high-level views of enterprise services
> >> >>> >> 3. A single system of record for all IT processes
> >> >>> >> http://p.sf.net/sfu/servicenow-d2d-j
> >> >>> >> _______________________________________________
> >> >>> >> Kaldi-users mailing list
> >> >>> >> Kal...@li...
> >> >>> >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kaldi-users
> >> >>> >>
> >> >>> >
> >> >>> >
> >> >>> >
> >> >>> >
> >> >>> >
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> >>> > How ServiceNow helps IT people transform IT departments:
> >> >>> > 1. A cloud service to automate IT design, transition and
> operations
> >> >>> > 2. Dashboards that offer high-level views of enterprise services
> >> >>> > 3. A single system of record for all IT processes
> >> >>> > http://p.sf.net/sfu/servicenow-d2d-j
> >> >>> > _______________________________________________
> >> >>> > Kaldi-users mailing list
> >> >>> > Kal...@li...
> >> >>> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kaldi-users
> >> >>> >
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> >>> How ServiceNow helps IT people transform IT departments:
> >> >>> 1. A cloud service to automate IT design, transition and operations
> >> >>> 2. Dashboards that offer high-level views of enterprise services
> >> >>> 3. A single system of record for all IT processes
> >> >>> http://p.sf.net/sfu/servicenow-d2d-j
> >> >>> _______________________________________________
> >> >>> Kaldi-users mailing list
> >> >>> Kal...@li...
> >> >>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kaldi-users
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> >> How ServiceNow helps IT people transform IT departments:
> >> >> 1. A cloud service to automate IT design, transition and operations
> >> >> 2. Dashboards that offer high-level views of enterprise services
> >> >> 3. A single system of record for all IT processes
> >> >> http://p.sf.net/sfu/servicenow-d2d-j
> >> >> _______________________________________________
> >> >> Kaldi-users mailing list
> >> >> Kal...@li...
> >> >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kaldi-users
> >> >>
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> > How ServiceNow helps IT people transform IT departments:
> >> > 1. A cloud service to automate IT design, transition and operations
> >> > 2. Dashboards that offer high-level views of enterprise services
> >> > 3. A single system of record for all IT processes
> >> > http://p.sf.net/sfu/servicenow-d2d-j
> >> > _______________________________________________
> >> > Kaldi-users mailing list
> >> > Kal...@li...
> >> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kaldi-users
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> >>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> How ServiceNow helps IT people transform IT departments:
> >> 1. A cloud service to automate IT design, transition and operations
> >> 2. Dashboards that offer high-level views of enterprise services
> >> 3. A single system of record for all IT processes
> >> http://p.sf.net/sfu/servicenow-d2d-j
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Kaldi-users mailing list
> >> Kal...@li...
> >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kaldi-users
> >
> >
> >
> >
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > How ServiceNow helps IT people transform IT departments:
> > 1. A cloud service to automate IT design, transition and operations
> > 2. Dashboards that offer high-level views of enterprise services
> > 3. A single system of record for all IT processes
> > http://p.sf.net/sfu/servicenow-d2d-j
> > _______________________________________________
> > Kaldi-users mailing list
> > Kal...@li...
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kaldi-users
> >
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> How ServiceNow helps IT people transform IT departments:
> 1. A cloud service to automate IT design, transition and operations
> 2. Dashboards that offer high-level views of enterprise services
> 3. A single system of record for all IT processes
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/servicenow-d2d-j
> _______________________________________________
> Kaldi-users mailing list
> Kal...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kaldi-users
>