|
From: Mailing l. u. f. U. C. a. U. <kal...@li...> - 2013-06-03 21:49:50
|
My corresponding numbers are -108.535 -> -95.116, and the difference is about the same. [It's strange that the absolute numbers differ slightly, though.] Could you do ls -l data/lang data/lang/phones exp/mono0a exp/mono0a/log exp/mono0a/decode/log and send the output? Dan On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 5:42 PM, Mailing list used for User Communication and Updates <kal...@li...> wrote: > Copied from exp/mono0a/log/update.39.log > > LOG (gmm-sum-accs:main():gmm-sum-accs.cc:60) Summed 2 stats, total > count 849568, avg like/frame -95.5657 > > Hao > > On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 4:29 PM, Mailing list used for User > Communication and Updates <kal...@li...> wrote: > > OK, that is quite weird. What is the avg like/frame on the final > > update.??.log? > > Dan > > > > > > > > On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 5:00 PM, Mailing list used for User Communication > and > > Updates <kal...@li...> wrote: > >> > >> Unfortunately those are absolute differences. Here is what I get for the > >> mono0a. > >> > >> %WER 40.44 [ 2282 / 5643, 118 ins, 537 del, 1627 sub ] > >> exp/mono0a/decode_tgpr_eval92/wer_9 > >> > >> And below is the reported one in RESULTS. > >> > >> exp/mono0a/decode_tgpr_eval92/wer_10:%WER 25.54 [ 1441 / 5643, 149 > >> ins, 191 del, 1101 sub ] > >> > >> I will try to checkout the same version as the RESULTS file and run > >> the experiments again. > >> > >> Here is the total data count from exp/mono0a/log/update.0.log. > >> > >> LOG (gmm-sum-accs:main():gmm-sum-accs.cc:60) Summed 2 stats, total > >> count 849568, avg like/frame -109.265 > >> > >> Thanks for your help. > >> > >> Hao > >> > >> On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 3:43 PM, Mailing list used for User > >> Communication and Updates <kal...@li...> wrote: > >> > Assuming those are relative numbers, they're probably within the > margin > >> > of > >> > error. See if it's the same on other test sets. Because various > >> > algorithms > >> > call rand(), and different machines implement this differently, > results > >> > aren't fully reproducible. > >> > > >> > But to check that it's not some code change that hurts the results, > you > >> > could try checking out a copy with the same revision number as the > >> > RESULTS > >> > file, and running again and seeing what results you get. If there is > a > >> > difference, I'd like to know. > >> > > >> > It's also possible some files were missing in your WSJ distribution-- > >> > let me > >> > know the data count reported in one the */log/update.log files and > I'll > >> > compare with a local copy. > >> > > >> > Dan > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 4:34 PM, Mailing list used for User > Communication > >> > and > >> > Updates <kal...@li...> wrote: > >> >> > >> >> Hi, > >> >> > >> >> I'm following the WSJ s5 recipe, and I wasn't able to reproduce the > >> >> results stated in the RESULTS file. Are we supposed to get exactly > the > >> >> same numbers with the (hyper-)parameters given in the recipe? > >> >> > >> >> Just to give a sense of how far I'm off. My monophone models perform > >> >> 10% > >> >> worse than the reported results on eval92 and the resulting triphone > >> >> models perform 4% worse. > >> >> > >> >> Thanks, > >> >> Hao > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > >> >> How ServiceNow helps IT people transform IT departments: > >> >> 1. A cloud service to automate IT design, transition and operations > >> >> 2. Dashboards that offer high-level views of enterprise services > >> >> 3. A single system of record for all IT processes > >> >> http://p.sf.net/sfu/servicenow-d2d-j > >> >> _______________________________________________ > >> >> Kaldi-users mailing list > >> >> Kal...@li... > >> >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kaldi-users > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > >> > How ServiceNow helps IT people transform IT departments: > >> > 1. A cloud service to automate IT design, transition and operations > >> > 2. Dashboards that offer high-level views of enterprise services > >> > 3. A single system of record for all IT processes > >> > http://p.sf.net/sfu/servicenow-d2d-j > >> > _______________________________________________ > >> > Kaldi-users mailing list > >> > Kal...@li... > >> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kaldi-users > >> > > >> > >> > >> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > >> How ServiceNow helps IT people transform IT departments: > >> 1. A cloud service to automate IT design, transition and operations > >> 2. Dashboards that offer high-level views of enterprise services > >> 3. A single system of record for all IT processes > >> http://p.sf.net/sfu/servicenow-d2d-j > >> _______________________________________________ > >> Kaldi-users mailing list > >> Kal...@li... > >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kaldi-users > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > How ServiceNow helps IT people transform IT departments: > > 1. A cloud service to automate IT design, transition and operations > > 2. Dashboards that offer high-level views of enterprise services > > 3. A single system of record for all IT processes > > http://p.sf.net/sfu/servicenow-d2d-j > > _______________________________________________ > > Kaldi-users mailing list > > Kal...@li... > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kaldi-users > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > How ServiceNow helps IT people transform IT departments: > 1. A cloud service to automate IT design, transition and operations > 2. Dashboards that offer high-level views of enterprise services > 3. A single system of record for all IT processes > http://p.sf.net/sfu/servicenow-d2d-j > _______________________________________________ > Kaldi-users mailing list > Kal...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kaldi-users > |