On Sun, Mar 3, 2013 at 12:25 PM, Josh Juneau <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> Thanks for the response. I've gone ahead and added the website repo (andIt's not a big deal - 2.5.x or 2.5 works fine :)
> committed the sources) to jython-docs, so now the official website
> repository is as follows:
> Let's utilize the sandbox/jython-website repo for development purposes...I
> think this is a good model. In other words, if we decide to change the
> format of the site at all then we have a repo for testing, which will allow
> for collaborative work on future website redesigns. Therefore, the
> development website repo is at:
> Unfortunately, I jumped the gun and created the repository for 2.5 docs at:
> However, I have not made any commits there yet. If you prefer that we go
> with 2.5 instead of 2.5.x, then I will create the jython-docs/2.5 repo and
> we can work from there. Then I will try and coordinate with someone to
> remove 2.5.x. Sound okay?
We definitely do not need a 2.6 of any kind.
> Lastly, if we go with jython-docs/2.5, then I will also create a
> jython-docs/2.7 for the latest docset. Do we need a 2.6 documentation set?
Thanks again for doing all of this! I am getting ready to upload my
first try at a devguide. I'll have to figure out how to link it in