Hi Alan,

I tried asyncore with Jython 2.2.1 and received error messages that the port is not watchable.  Would you expect this to be the response now until more updates are made??

 - Bob

-----Original Message-----
From: Alan Kennedy <jython-dev@xhaus.com>
To: boblusebob@aim.com
Cc: jython-dev@lists.sourceforge.net
Sent: Fri, 4 Jan 2008 1:46 am
Subject: Re: [Jython-dev] Answered 2 Old Problems

> I also updated a more recent problem that is quite a bit more problematic.
> Its number is 1782548. I am willing to work on it and I have background in
> that area, but I will need help from Alan or someone to answer questions and
> advise me on making modifications to the socket.py module, as it can be
> fairly complex.

I have updated the bug report to specify the problem and illustrate
the solution.

Essentially, the problem is that the UDP socket implementation is
still in a halfway house. The creation of sockets is done through the
java.nio.DatagramChannel.open() method. But the send and receive are
still done through the old java.net.DatagramSocket.send() and
.receive() methods.

I have attached test code to the bug that shows that if the UDP
implementation is updated to the use the
java.nio.DatagramChannel.send() and .receive() methods, this bug will




This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.
Jython-dev mailing list

More new features than ever. Check out the new AIM(R) Mail!