.for .endfor feature for JWasm
Brought to you by:
japheth
Menu
▾
▴
Hi Japheth
I am glad you are back
while you were absent I implemented some features I wanted to have in JWasm
I don't know if you are aware of that from masm32 forum because you did not say anything about it
I have just finished .for, .endfor feature and implemented it in v2.06e version
I am satisfied how it works and if you are interested to implement it in v2.07 I would appreciate it
It looks like that :
.for ( hWnd=lParam,edx=88,ecx=4:eax != 24 && hWnd > lParam || ebx <= 20 || ebx >= 3:eax=23,edx=24,ebx++)
nop
.endfor
;forever loop
.for (::)
.break .if eax
.endfor
I am not interested to have any credits for that, I just wish to have them in JWasm because I think that it is a greatest assembler yet
If you are interested I will send you a code for it
best regards
Hello habran,
> … if you are interested to implement it in v2.07
v2.07 is in the "release candidate" state - that means, only regressions and SEVERE bugs will make me change the source.
> .for ( hWnd=lParam,edx=88,ecx=4:eax != 24 && hWnd > lParam || ebx <= 20 || ebx >= 3:eax=23,edx=24,ebx++)
the colon (':') is already an operator - I don't think that it should be "overloaded". If a segment override is needed:
then you are in trouble.
I also don't like additional C operators ( =, ++, -, … ) in assembly - the ones already included in the hll directives (&&, ||, …) are rather "hackish". And what if you want to increment by 10 instead of 1?
hello Japheth
1. IMO assembly programming is not for imbeciles, if we say that ':' is a delimiter than they should not use it differently
2. if you looked at the source code here http://masm32.com/board/index.php?topic=402.0 you would be able to see
that '++' and '-' are two out of 10 operators (+= -= &= |= *= /= << >>) E.G. eax+=10
however, this is your baby and you can do what ever you decide it is right to do
I wouldn't bother you with it if Vortex did not ask me to contact you
sorry to bother you I know that you are busy
best regards