Re: [JVM-B] haskell-jvm-bridge-0.3.1.RC5 revived!

[Artem Gr <ar...@bi...>]

Ashley Yakeley wrote:
> If you're using CVS, you probably want the Rel0_2_Branch branch tag.
I feel darcs is much more convenient to the end-user (including me): a) 
no need to "login" to get the contents; b) you can always "darcs send" 
your patches by email; etc. The only trick is to remember the 
--set-scripts-executable option.
I can import CVS into darcs, if you want the history (had done it few 
monthes ago to some of my projects).
Do you oppose moving to darcs? I can reapply necessary patches to the 
CVS HEAD then, but i'm not familiar with CVS branching.

> I'm not sure what state the HEAD is in.
I've tried HEAD and it was around 0.2 version, and wasn't in a 
compilable state at all.