From: <gu...@st...> - 2002-02-21 22:54:48
|
On Thu, Feb 21, 2002 at 01:47:50PM -0800, Kent Beck wrote: > A clever GUI is both more likely to be helpful, less likely to be > obstructive, and satisfies our design aesthetic than going into the > framework to change the error message. However, we don't have such a GUI at > the moment, nor does it seem to be just one step ahead, so I propose than in > the spirit of wabi-sabi we summarize the string differences for the moment. > The current situation satisfies no one, and it would be good to take a step > ahead on this for 3.8. > > Kent > Thanks Kent. I've got a patch ready for action, incorporating my strdiff util into the Assert base class. I just need to clean up the license language to make it clear I'm contributing these methods to JUnit with no strings attached. I found the IBM Public License from a pointer on sourceforge but I'm not sure it's correct... Where can I find the JUnit license, to make sure I'm doing this right? - A P.S. As written now, it uses the old style for objects that are null, or objects that are not Strings. Should I also make it use the old style for short strings? (Strings that are <60 chars in length) -- Alex Chaffee mailto:al...@jg... jGuru - Java News and FAQs http://www.jguru.com/alex/ Creator of Gamelan http://www.gamelan.com/ Founder of Purple Technology http://www.purpletech.com/ Curator of Stinky Art Collective http://www.stinky.com/ |