Re: [Jsynthlib-devel] jsynthlib.org expired in the last couple of days!

[frankster <jsy...@te...>]

On 09/23/11 16:29, Joe Emenaker wrote:
> On 9/23/2011 8:17 AM, Vladimir Avdonin wrote:
>> JSynthLib sounds like library, not application. For this reason I passed
>> by it in searches when looking for synth applications.
>>
>> How about SynthJ for the first contest entry?
> I like that it's short, but it's still a little cryptic.
>
> I'm thinking that we might want some combination of two words: what it
> does stuff *with*, and what it *does* with them. Off the top of my head,
> only two words for each category come to mind:
> (Sysex|Synth)(Manager|Librarian)
>
> And then an optional "J" at the front. So, we could have something like
> "JSysexManager" (and, yes, I realize that one of the pairings,
> "JSynthLibrarian", is almost identical to what we have now).
>
If a name changed very far it could make it hard for people to find the 
project.

I agree that the Lib suffix is confusing for the reason already stated.

My vote would be to refer to it in documentation, release notes etc, as 
JSynthLibrarian, while keeping the domain name / sf project name the same.

frankie