AW: [Jsynthlib-devel] A Modest Proposal - Sampler Support for JSynthLib

[Joachim B. <jba...@pi...>]

Hi,

sox:
http://sox.sourceforge.net/

Regards,
Joachim

> -----Urspr=FCngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: jsy...@li...
> [mailto:jsy...@li...]Im Auftrag von Joe
> Emenaker
> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 6. Juli 2005 08:27
> An: Craig A. Vanderborgh
> Cc: jsy...@li...
> Betreff: Re: [Jsynthlib-devel] A Modest Proposal - Sampler Support for
> JSynthLib
>=20
>=20
> Craig A. Vanderborgh wrote:
>=20
> > Well that's kind of silly, isn't it now??  After all, libst.a from=20
> > "sox" is totally unencumbered and supports the=20
> reading/writing of just=20
> > about any sample file format you could care to name.
>=20
> What's "libst.a", and what's "sox"?
>=20
> > Why pick a sample format if you can have them all?  Why is=20
> this even=20
> > an issue??
>=20
> I'm not sure, since I wasn't participating in that thread. I=20
> think the=20
> original idea was to just leave the samples in the native=20
> format of the=20
> instrument they came from. Maybe this was an issue when serialization=20
> was being used to store things... but I think we're moving to=20
> XML now...=20
> so maybe it's not an issue anymore. Dunno.
>=20
> - Joe
>=20