Re: [Jsynthlib-devel] A Modest Proposal - Sampler Support for JSynthLib

[Joe E. <jo...@em...>]

Craig A. Vanderborgh wrote:

> Well that's kind of silly, isn't it now??  After all, libst.a from 
> "sox" is totally unencumbered and supports the reading/writing of just 
> about any sample file format you could care to name.

What's "libst.a", and what's "sox"?

> Why pick a sample format if you can have them all?  Why is this even 
> an issue??

I'm not sure, since I wasn't participating in that thread. I think the 
original idea was to just leave the samples in the native format of the 
instrument they came from. Maybe this was an issue when serialization 
was being used to store things... but I think we're moving to XML now... 
so maybe it's not an issue anymore. Dunno.

- Joe