Re: [Jsynthlib-devel] The addWidget(...) design

[Joe E. <jo...@em...>]

Bill Zwicky wrote:

> Since you want to decode and encode your sysex all at once, you need 
> to extend IPatch, not Patch.  You can then hide your byte array, and 
> require all access to go through getByte, getInt, etc.

Oh... so the addWidget and ParamModels are all looking for IPatch, and 
not Patch? If that's the case, then my data-model could just implement 
that and I could pass the data-model directly in place of a Patch 
object. I'll try that....

- Joe