From: Joe E. <jo...@em...> - 2005-03-04 03:27:15
|
I'm done with the initial work on turning the DeviceAddDialog JList into a JTree. Now, I'm just working on the parts that group the tree in various ways (ie, first by manufacturer and then by type, by manufacturer only, by type only, etc). I'm also considering making it possible to add multiple synths with a single instance of the dialog. Anyway, my current work forced me to go into DevicesConfig an clean things up. While I was there, I decided to keep track of devices with a class I named "DeviceDescriptor". It's merely a data-holding class which keeps DeviceName, ShortName, IDString, Manufacturer, Type, and ClassName all together. Then, I'm able to just maintain a list of all of the descriptors. Right now, DeviceDescriptor is only used by a few classes that I'm working on... but I'd like to expand it. The reason is that DevicesConfig has a handful of methods like "getClassNameForDeviceName", "getShortNameForDeviceName", "getIDStringForDeviceName", and then there are more for "getXxxByIDString" or "getXxxByClassName". What I'd *like* to do is just have "getDescriptorForDeviceName", "getDescriptorForClassName", etc. and then the *calling* method gets the whole descriptor and can get whatever data elements it wants out of that. This will require me to go modify some classes that are currently outside the scope of my development on DeviceAddDialog. They're small changes, but I wanted to check to see if anyone had any objections first. Ultimately, I think it would make for cleaner design if DeviceDescriptor got more widely used, too. Ultimately, it would be nice if this was how synthdrivers reported what devices they can interact with. This way, a single Device class could offer back an array of DeviceDescriptors for various synths that it knew how to control. Of course, that would be down the road a ways.... but I just wanted to put that in your heads. - Joe |