From: Joachim B. <jba...@pi...> - 2005-03-01 09:34:47
|
> Well, if it accepts general size parameters, then it's not=20 > neccesarily=20 > "little". It could be "big" just as easily. Shouldn't it be called=20 > something like "SizeableKnobWidget" before it's added to core? It just creates a KnobWidget with a different size. > Even better, would be to just add the new constructor (and other = needed=20 > code) to KnobWidget and then have the default KnobWidget constructor=20 > call the parameterized one with the default sizes. I would prefer that. Or does something speak against a new constructor in KnobWidget? But IMHO it should be done (or commited) after 0.20 is released. Regards, Joachim Backhaus |