AW: AW: AW: AW: [Jsynthlib-devel] AW: Eclipse: Indentation / Displayed tab width

[Joachim B. <jba...@pi...>]

Hi,

> No, I tried to mean, for example, "J2SE 5.0 Documentation" on
> http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.5.0/download.jsp.  How can I express it?

I think I understood now and changed the text accordingly.

> Good point.  We also need a document for core developers.  How about
> adding "(for core developers)" for now?

For me it's OK. I added this and changed the style of this part
into "third person".

> But I'm not sure it
> worth for you to send your precious time for this now.

That's a good point. At first I should finish all the synthdrivers
I have planned.

Regards,
Joachim Backhaus

> -----Urspr=FCngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: jsy...@li...
> [mailto:jsy...@li...]Im=20
> Auftrag von Hiroo
> Hayashi
> Gesendet: Freitag, 4. Februar 2005 15:19
> An: jsy...@li...
> Betreff: Re: AW: AW: AW: [Jsynthlib-devel] AW: Eclipse: Indentation /
> Displayed tab width
>=20
>=20
> # Quick response before going to work.
>=20
> Joachim> I dont't understand the following sentence:
> Joachim> "If you installed the Javadoc of JDK, ..."
> Joachim>=20
> Joachim> I thought the Javadoc is part of every JDK=20
> Joachim> whether it is from Sun, IBM or whomsoever.
> Joachim> And you need a JDK to run Eclipse, don't you?
>=20
> Good point.
>=20
> Joachim> I changed it to "For using the Javadoc generation go to ...".
>=20
> No, I tried to mean, for example, "J2SE 5.0 Documentation" on
> http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.5.0/download.jsp.  How can I express it?
>=20
> Joachim> Another thing:
> Joachim> Do we really need the part=20
> Joachim> "<h3>I.c. Proper Use of Access Control Modifier</h3>"
> Joachim>=20
> Joachim> I think this is more a project internal documentation
> Joachim> while the target group of the document are all potential
> Joachim> driver developers.
>=20
> Good point.  We also need a document for core developers.  How about
> adding "(for core developers)" for now?
>=20
> Joachim> The use of the "public" keyword is a problem I think=20
> we can solve
> Joachim> in step-by-step updates.
> Joachim> I can do this next week from tuesday on if nothing speaks
> Joachim> against it.
> Joachim> If we don't change it we will never get rid of this problem
> Joachim> and with every new driver it will be more difficult to solve.
>=20
> Well, I think we already resolved this issue almost for=20
> classed which is
> used by synth drivers.  Yes, it not perfect yet.  But I'm not sure it
> worth for you to send your precious time for this now.  We have a plan
> to change package structure.  The rule? for modifier will be changed.
>=20
> And "public vs protected" and "public vs not modifier" are often
> difficult decision...
> --=20
> Hiroo Hayashi
>=20
>=20
>=20
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IntelliVIEW -- Interactive=20
> Reporting
> Tool for open source databases. Create drag-&-drop reports. Save time
> by over 75%! Publish reports on the web. Export to DOC, XLS, RTF, etc.
> Download a FREE copy at http://www.intelliview.com/go/osdn_nl
> _______________________________________________
> Jsynthlib-devel mailing list
> Jsy...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jsynthlib-devel
>=20