From: Hiroo H. <hir...@co...> - 2005-02-04 14:17:14
|
# Quick response before going to work. Joachim> I dont't understand the following sentence: Joachim> "If you installed the Javadoc of JDK, ..." Joachim> Joachim> I thought the Javadoc is part of every JDK Joachim> whether it is from Sun, IBM or whomsoever. Joachim> And you need a JDK to run Eclipse, don't you? Good point. Joachim> I changed it to "For using the Javadoc generation go to ...". No, I tried to mean, for example, "J2SE 5.0 Documentation" on http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.5.0/download.jsp. How can I express it? Joachim> Another thing: Joachim> Do we really need the part Joachim> "<h3>I.c. Proper Use of Access Control Modifier</h3>" Joachim> Joachim> I think this is more a project internal documentation Joachim> while the target group of the document are all potential Joachim> driver developers. Good point. We also need a document for core developers. How about adding "(for core developers)" for now? Joachim> The use of the "public" keyword is a problem I think we can solve Joachim> in step-by-step updates. Joachim> I can do this next week from tuesday on if nothing speaks Joachim> against it. Joachim> If we don't change it we will never get rid of this problem Joachim> and with every new driver it will be more difficult to solve. Well, I think we already resolved this issue almost for classed which is used by synth drivers. Yes, it not perfect yet. But I'm not sure it worth for you to send your precious time for this now. We have a plan to change package structure. The rule? for modifier will be changed. And "public vs protected" and "public vs not modifier" are often difficult decision... -- Hiroo Hayashi |