Re: [Jsynthlib-devel] some core update

[Hiroo H. <hir...@co...>]

> >>I think it should be possible, because BankDriver knows its Device
> >>and the singleSysexID of the single patch, which it's holding.
> > 
> > 
> > It may be possible to use Device and syngleSysexID but it would be an
> > expensive way.
> 
> Do you mean expensive, because the bank driver has to determine the appropriate single driver in a loop?

Yes.  But it's OK, because we have a good alternative,
myModel.getPatchAt(0, 0).getDriver(), as I wrote.

> > But as I wrote, BankPatch.createPatch() is an abstract method.  We
> > cannot do what you wrote in core.  What we can do is to document
> > clearly and to let synth driver developers do that.

> I see.
> I think the best way would be now, if I try to write the code by
> myself and then I will see what happend.  Alas currently I'm a
> little bit busy and don't know how much time I can spend.

I don't see any problem now.  If a synth driver developer knows this,
it is very easy to implement.
-- 
Hiroo Hayashi