Re: [Jsynthlib-devel] Patch Structure.

[Hiroo H. <hir...@co...>]

Rib and Torsten,

Rib > Second, I have one more comment on the package structure (although it
Rib > does not conflict with my proposed changes).  Since there are so many
Rib > dialogs, would it not be a good idea to have a package for them, and
Rib > perhaps also a package for the config panels?

I'm not sure which is better.

The number of files under jsynthlib (current core) will be about half
of the current one.  I would say the current core has too many files.
Half of files may be enough to be managed.

On the other hand, to access members in a different package we need
more public members (methods and fields).  A dialog class does not
access members of other dialogs, since there are independent each
other in general.  The package will be a collection of independent
classes, and jsynthlib (core) package needs to have more public
members.

If I have to choose one of the selection, I would take not to create a
package for dialogs.  But this is not strong preference.  Please
create it if think it is better.

Torsten> Perhaps this could make a future localization (translation
Torsten> into other languages as english) easier.

Why making package for dialog helps localization?  I think it is
opposite.  But the difference would be very little.
-- 
Hiroo Hayashi