Re: [Jsynthlib-devel] Interfaces

[Rib R. <ri...@gm...>]

I guess we need to choose the packages where the support files for xml
drivers, the drivers written in xml, and the ruby support classes
should go.

For easy reference, my original recomendation for these were,
respectively, org.jsynthlib.jsynthlib.core.xml,
org.jsynthlib.jsynthlib.xmldrivers, and org.jsynthlib.ruby.

I believe that Hiroo suggested org.jsynthlib.jsynthlib.xml and
org.jsynthlib.jsynthlib.drivers.

I'd be fine with having xml under jsynthlib instead of core, but I
wondered if it might be confused with the actual drivers written in
xml.  I recommended a separate directory for different types of
drivers because the parser can't tell the difference between a java
file and a messed up xml file.  But I suppose I could easily solve
this by requiring xml drivers to have a common extension (.xml,
.device, or .driver come to mind as possibilities).

On Sat, 14 Aug 2004 08:31:33 -0500, Hiroo Hayashi
<hir...@co...> wrote:
> Rib,
> 
> It seems that we are thinking same thing.  Which package structure you
> need to decide now?
> 
> I'll stop changing core files for a while not to create conflict with
> you.  Are there anything I can help you for the interface change?

It'll probably be easier if I do it all myself.  I'll try to do it today.