[Jsynthlib-devel] Re: [jsynthlib-dev] Re-animation of storePatch(Patch) etc.

[Hiroo H. <hir...@co...>]

Joachim> Hiroo > If we define the following method in Driver class, the change was
Joachim> not
Joachim> Hiroo > necessary and we can keep compatibility of synth drivers.
Joachim> 
Joachim> I see no reason to re-animate the old storePatch(Patch ...) method.
Joachim> The change is done, why should it be re-animated?
Joachim> 
Joachim> Do I forget something?

There may be (probably 'are', I guess) drivers outside CVS.

Joachim> But what is on major API changes like from Version 0.18
Joachim> to 0.19?

We made the changes with good reasons.  On this case I don't see a good
reason to lose compatibility (except the change is done).

I read help pages of Eclipses and knew the refracturing is a great
feature.  I'll play with it and revert the change if it is easy for me. 
I agree with you it is not worth to much work.

Joachim> Perhaps we should make a list which supported synthesizers
Joachim> each one of us has.

What do you mean by 'us'?  The current ML subscriber or reader (I think
the latter is less than the former).  I agree.  It would be better the
list of tested driver when we release a version.
-- 
Hiroo Hayashi